Skip to content
VulniPulse
Advisory severityCritical9.8Red Hat Linux

Critical [CVE-2024-12084] Rsync: heap buffer overflow in rsync due to improper checksum length handling

This critical-severity Red Hat Linux advisory covers CVE-2024-12084 affecting Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10, Red Hat package: rsync.

Aggregated and source-linked by VulniPulse. Data sources, validation and limitations.

CVE-2024-12084 Source published Source updated

VulniPulse record published

CVE-2024-12084
Affected products & platforms
Red Hat LinuxRed Hat Enterprise Linux
Open source advisory

Summary

A heap-based buffer overflow flaw was found in the rsync daemon. This issue is due to improper handling of attacker-controlled checksum lengths (s2length) in the code.

When MAX_DIGEST_LEN exceeds the fixed SUM_LENGTH (16 bytes), an attacker can write out of bounds in the sum2 buffer. This vulnerability only affects a limited range of Rsync versions, rsync-3.2.7 and rsync-3.3.0.

Red Hat Enterprise Linux does not ship these versions of Rsync and is not affected. Red Hat considers the severity of this vulnerability to be Critical only in cases where anonymous read access is allowed.

Depending on the configuration and implementation choices, the severity may be significantly reduced for your organization. There are two different methods for utilizing Rsync from a remote system: contacting an Rsync daemon directly with TCP or using a remote-shell program as the transport (such as ssh or rsh).

The risk of this vulnerability changes depending on which connection method is used. The default configuration of an Rsync daemon (rsyncd) running as a service does not require authentication.

While rsyncd can be configured to require users to provide valid credentials, anonymous read access is a common configuration used by file sharing and mirroring hosts. The capabilities of the rsyncd process may vary depending on the user configured to run the Rsync daemon.

Is CVE-2024-12084 exploited?

No exploitation is reported in the sources VulniPulse tracks: CVE-2024-12084 is not in the CISA KEV catalog (checked ) and this advisory does not report exploitation. That is not proof the vulnerability cannot be exploited.

How do I fix CVE-2024-12084?

Upgrade to a fixed release named by Red Hat:

  • rsync-0:3.4.1-2.el10
  • RHBA-2025:6470

Confirm against the vendor advisory before you patch.

Affected versions

No affected-version range was extracted from the source record. The vendor advisory is authoritative. Check it before change work.

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 20 days ago·verify at source

Fixed versions
  • rsync-0:3.4.1-2.el10
  • RHBA-2025:6470

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 20 days ago·verify at source

Mitigation checklist

Recommended fix / mitigation
  • Red Hat recommends filtering untrusted connections to Rsync via firewall rules on the host and on network firewall appliances. Additionally, systems which only need to provide remote Rsync access to users with known identities can enable authentication using the ```auth users``` parameter in their rsyncd configuration file (rsyncd.conf). Systems that provide anonymous read access to hosted files via Rsync, such as mirror hosts, do not have reasonable mitigation options available. We strongly urge operators using vulnerable versions of Rsync to update as soon as possible.

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 20 days ago·verify at source

Get an email when Red Hat RHEL & SELinux publishes the next one.

See Red Hat RHEL & SELinux's last 90 days of advisories first. Then choose one product with live alerts free for life, or a free month of real-time alerts on everything with the severity, the fixed version and the vendor's link (card needed, then US$15/month; we email you before the first charge).

Alert me about Red Hat RHEL & SELinux
All Red Hat Linux advisories

iPhone and Android apps · New on the App Store

Monitor future Red Hat Linux CVEs from your phone.

Choose a whole vendor or a precise platform, then receive matching security advisories by phone notification, email, or both. Coverage follows 34 official vendor sources and 160+ reviewed platform categories.

Discussion(0)

No comments yet. Share field notes, upgrade gotchas, or questions — verify against the vendor advisory before acting on community advice.

Sign in to join the discussion.