Medium [CVE-2025-2487] 389-ds-base: null pointer dereference leads to denial of service
This medium-severity Red Hat Linux advisory covers CVE-2025-2487 affecting Red Hat Directory Server 12.4 EUS for RHEL 9, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Extended Update Support, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.
Aggregated and source-linked by VulniPulse. Data sources, validation and limitations.
VulniPulse record published
Summary
A flaw was found in the 389-ds-base LDAP Server. This issue occurs when issuing a Modify DN LDAP operation through the ldap protocol, when the function return value is not tested and a NULL pointer is dereferenced.
If a privileged user performs a ldap MODDN operation after a failed operation, it could lead to a Denial of Service (DoS) or system crash. Red Hat rates this as a Moderate severity since the impact is limited to privileged users who can perform the operations, leading to an impact on server Availability.
This issue is not reproducible in Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 10 due to the way the RHEL 10 database write operations are serialized, therefore, it is not affected. 389-ds-base has been fixed in RHEL 9.5.
Hence, it's actually not-affected and fix will be picked after rebase from RHEL-9.5. Weakness: CWE-476.
Affected Red Hat products: Red Hat Directory Server 12.4 EUS for RHEL 9; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Extended Update Support; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8. Will not fix / out of support: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.
Red Hat fixing advisory: RHSA-2025:3670, RHSA-2025:4491, RHSA-2025:7395, RHSA-2025:3663.
Affected products named by the advisory: Red Hat package: 389-ds-base.
Is CVE-2025-2487 exploited?
No exploitation is reported in the sources VulniPulse tracks: CVE-2025-2487 is not in the CISA KEV catalog (checked ) and this advisory does not report exploitation. That is not proof the vulnerability cannot be exploited.
How do I fix CVE-2025-2487?
Upgrade to a fixed release named by Red Hat:
- redhat-ds:12-9040020250325181857.1674d574
- 389-ds-base-0:2.5.2-9.el9_5
- 389-ds-base-0:2.6.1-8.el9_6
- 389-ds-base-0:2.4.5-14.el9_4
- RHSA-2025:3670
- RHSA-2025:4491
- RHSA-2025:7395
- RHSA-2025:3663
Confirm against the vendor advisory before you patch.
Affected versions
No affected-version range was extracted from the source record. The vendor advisory is authoritative. Check it before change work.
Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 5 days ago·verify at source
- redhat-ds:12-9040020250325181857.1674d574
- 389-ds-base-0:2.5.2-9.el9_5
- 389-ds-base-0:2.6.1-8.el9_6
- 389-ds-base-0:2.4.5-14.el9_4
- RHSA-2025:3670
- RHSA-2025:4491
- RHSA-2025:7395
- RHSA-2025:3663
Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 5 days ago·verify at source
Mitigation checklist
- Currently, no mitigation is available for this vulnerability.
Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 5 days ago·verify at source
Get an email when Red Hat RHEL & SELinux publishes the next one.
See Red Hat RHEL & SELinux's last 90 days of advisories first. Then choose one product with live alerts free for life, or a free month of real-time alerts on everything with the severity, the fixed version and the vendor's link (card needed, then US$15/month; we email you before the first charge).
More Red Hat Linux advisories
- CVE-2026-111497Oct 22, 2026Out-of-Bounds Write in Google Brotli Decoder
- CVE-2026-109619Oct 21, 2026fatal error handling retains stale request state leading to use-after-free
- CVE-2026-46300May 13, 2026"Fragnesia" is a variant of Dirty Frag vulnerability in the ESP/XFRM leading to Local
- CVE-2026-31431Apr 22, 2026algif_aead - Revert to operating out-of-place
- CVE-2025-31277Mar 18, 2026Processing maliciously crafted web content may lead to memory corruption
- CVE-2026-123158Nov 5, 2026Password authentication bypass via password hash misinterpretation
iPhone and Android apps · New on the App Store
Monitor future Red Hat Linux CVEs from your phone.
Choose a whole vendor or a precise platform, then receive matching security advisories by phone notification, email, or both. Coverage follows 34 official vendor sources and 160+ reviewed platform categories.
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Share field notes, upgrade gotchas, or questions — verify against the vendor advisory before acting on community advice.
Sign in to join the discussion.