Skip to content
VulniPulse
Medium5.7Red Hat Linux Updated

Medium [CVE-2025-31936] Privilege escalation via improper memory range handling in SMM

This medium-severity Red Hat Linux advisory covers CVE-2025-31936 affecting Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.

CVE-2025-31936 Published Aug 11, 2026Updated by vendor Aug 11, 2026
Affected products & platforms
Red Hat LinuxRed Hat Enterprise Linux
Open vendor advisory

Android app · Google Play

Monitor future Red Hat Linux CVEs from your phone.

Choose a whole vendor or a precise platform, then receive matching security advisories by phone notification, email, or both. Coverage follows 32 official vendor sources and 160+ reviewed platform categories.

Matching phone alertsOptional email delivery

Summary

Privilege escalation via improper memory range handling in SMM. Red Hat rates this moderate (CVSS 5.7).

Weakness: CWE-823.

Affected products named by the advisory: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8; and 3 more.

Affected products named by the advisory: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9; Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4; Red Hat package: microcode_ctl.

Affected versions

No affected-version range was extracted from the source record. The vendor advisory is authoritative — check it before change work.

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 1 hour ago·verify at source

Fixed versions

No fixed release is recorded yet. That does not prove no patch exists — confirm against the vendor advisory.

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 1 hour ago·verify at source

Mitigation checklist

Recommended fix / mitigation
  • This vulnerability only affects systems using Intel Trust Domain Extensions (TDX) on Intel Xeon 6 processors. Systems not using Intel TDX are not vulnerable to this issue. Disabling Intel TDX, where feasible, removes the exposure to this vulnerability.

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 1 hour ago·verify at source

Discussion(0)

No comments yet. Share field notes, upgrade gotchas, or questions — verify against the vendor advisory before acting on community advice.

Sign in to join the discussion.