Medium [CVE-2025-5278] heap buffer under-read in gnu coreutils sort via key specification
This medium-severity Red Hat Linux advisory covers CVE-2025-5278 affecting Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9, Cost Management Metrics Operator 4.
Aggregated and source-linked by VulniPulse. Data sources, validation and limitations.
VulniPulse record published
Android app · Google Play
Monitor future Red Hat Linux CVEs from your phone.
Choose a whole vendor or a precise platform, then receive matching security advisories by phone notification, email, or both. Coverage follows 32 official vendor sources and 160+ reviewed platform categories.
Summary
A flaw was found in GNU Coreutils. The sort utility's begfield() function is vulnerable to a heap buffer under-read.
The program may access memory outside the allocated buffer if a user runs a crafted command using the traditional key format. A malicious input could lead to a crash or leak sensitive data.
The severity of this issue is considered Moderate rather than Critical because successful exploitation requires the use of the traditional key specification syntax with an exceptionally large character position value, which is uncommon in typical usage.
Although the vulnerability can lead to a heap buffer overflow resulting in a read one byte before the allocated buffer, it does not enable code execution, privilege escalation, or direct compromise of data confidentiality or integrity. The impact is therefore primarily limited to potential service disruption due to application crashes.
Furthermore, default RHEL configurations such as SELinux enforcement, ASLR, and memory protections reduce the likelihood of exploitation and limit the scope of any resulting impact. These safeguards, along with typical system usage patterns that do not commonly invoke the vulnerable code path, restrict exploitability in default and hardened environments.
Affected versions
No affected-version range was extracted from the source record. The vendor advisory is authoritative — check it before change work.
Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 21 days ago·verify at source
- coreutils-0:9.5-8.el10_2
- coreutils-0:8.32-41.el9_8
- costmanagement/costmanagement-metrics-rhel9-operator:1783539156
- discovery/discovery-ui-rhel9:1782756541
- discovery/discovery-server-rhel9:1784821670
- insights-proxy/insights-proxy-container-rhel9:1782890503
- rhosdt/tempo-gateway-opa-rhel9:1782501180
- rhosdt/tempo-gateway-rhel9:1782501200
- rhosdt/tempo-jaeger-query-rhel9:1782498923
- rhosdt/tempo-operator-bundle:1782510941
- rhosdt/tempo-query-rhel9:1782501220
- rhosdt/tempo-rhel9:1782501196
- rhosdt/tempo-rhel9-operator:1782501195
- rhosdt/opentelemetry-collector-rhel9:1785704636
- rhosdt/opentelemetry-rhel9-operator:1785704547
- rhui5/cds-kubernetes-rhel9:1784794818
- rhui5/cds-rhel9:1784794778
- rhui5/haproxy-rhel9:1784795112
- rhui5/installer-rhel9:1784794289
- rhui5/rhua-rhel9:1784795076
- RHSA-2026:33124
- RHSA-2026:28911
- RHSA-2026:39981
- RHSA-2026:33313
- RHSA-2026:46836
- RHSA-2026:34102
- RHSA-2026:33612
- RHSA-2026:50205
- RHSA-2026:44481
Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 21 days ago·verify at source
Mitigation checklist
- Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options don't meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.
Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 21 days ago·verify at source
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Share field notes, upgrade gotchas, or questions — verify against the vendor advisory before acting on community advice.
Sign in to join the discussion.