Skip to content
VulniPulse
High7.5Vendor: MediumRed Hat Linux

High [CVE-2026-12490] Bypass of client certificate verification with transfer over TLS

This high-severity Red Hat Linux advisory covers CVE-2026-12490.

CVE-2026-12490 Published Jun 25, 2026Updated by vendor Jun 25, 2026
Affected products & platforms
Red Hat LinuxUnclassified
Open vendor advisory

Android app · Google Play

Monitor future Red Hat Linux CVEs from your phone.

Choose a whole vendor or a precise platform, then receive matching security advisories by phone notification, email, or both. Coverage follows 32 official vendor sources and 160+ reviewed platform categories.

Matching phone alertsOptional email delivery

Summary

When a provide-xfr is given with a tls-auth-name, a secondary requesting a transfer should provide a client certificate with that name.

However, no client certificate is needed when the request comes in over TLS over the regular tls-port (and not the tls-auth-port) or over over TCP over the regular port, when the other conditions of the provide-xfr rule match. A flaw was found in nsd.

This authentication bypass allows an attacker to perform unauthorized zone transfers, leading to information disclosure. This flaw is rated as Moderate.

This allows unauthorized zone transfers and information disclosure if requests are made over the regular TLS or TCP port, as the `tls-auth-xfr-only` option is not enabled by default. This vulnerability doesn't affect any supported Red Hat Product.

Red Hat severity: Moderate — CVSS 7.5 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N). Weakness: CWE-303.

Affected versions

No affected-version range was extracted from the source record. The vendor advisory is authoritative — check it before change work.

Official advisory · medium-confidence parse· fetched 9 days ago·verify at source

Fixed versions

No fixed release is recorded yet. That does not prove no patch exists — confirm against the vendor advisory.

Official advisory · medium-confidence parse· fetched 9 days ago·verify at source

Mitigation

The source record does not include mitigation steps. That is not a statement that no fix exists — read the vendor advisory below for the authoritative guidance.

Official advisory · medium-confidence parse· fetched 9 days ago·verify at source

Discussion(0)

No comments yet. Share field notes, upgrade gotchas, or questions — verify against the vendor advisory before acting on community advice.

Sign in to join the discussion.