Skip to content
VulniPulse
Advisory severityHigh8.6Red Hat Linux

High [CVE-2026-13321] DNSSEC Validation Bypass via Out-of-Zone NSEC Next Field

This high-severity Red Hat Linux advisory covers CVE-2026-13321 affecting Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extended Lifecycle Support, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support.

Aggregated and source-linked by VulniPulse. Data sources, validation and limitations.

CVE-2026-13321 Source published Source updated

VulniPulse record published Record updated

Affected products & platforms
Red Hat LinuxRed Hat Enterprise Linux
Open source advisory

Get an email when Red Hat Linux publishes the next one.

VulniPulse checks Red Hat Linux's security advisories around the clock and emails you new ones with the severity, the fixed version and the vendor's link. First month free, then US$15/month; we email you before the first charge.

Start your free month

Summary

The BIND resolver accepts validly-signed NSEC records where the "Next Domain Name" field points outside the signer's zone. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.24, 9.21.0 through 9.21.23, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.24-S1.

An attacker controlling any DNSSEC-signed zone can craft NSEC records that span into victim zones, enabling cross-zone cache poisoning with authenticated denial-of-service responses (AD=1). Red Hat severity: Important — CVSS 8.6 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N).

Weakness: CWE-345.

Affected products named by the advisory: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extended Lifecycle Support; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Extended Update Support Long-Life Add-On; and 12 more.

Affected versions
  • 9.11.0
  • 9.18.50
  • 9.20.0
  • 9.20.24
  • 9.21.0
  • 9.21.23
  • 9.11.3
  • 9.20.9

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 2 days ago·verify at source

Fixed versions
  • bind-32:9.18.33-15.el10_2.10
  • bind-32:9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.21
  • bind9.16-32:9.16.23-0.22.el8_10.12
  • bind-32:9.11.36-16.el8_10.14
  • bind9.16-32:9.16.23-0.7.el8_6.11
  • bind9.16-32:9.16.23-0.14.el8_8.9
  • bind-32:9.16.23-40.el9_8.8
  • bind9.18-32:9.18.29-14.el9_8.8
  • bind-32:9.16.23-18.el9_4.12
  • bind-32:9.16.23-31.el9_6.4
  • openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:416.94.202609011112-0
  • openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:417.94.202609191027-0
  • openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:418.94.202609031320-0
  • openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:418.94.202609171815-0
  • openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:4.22.9.8.202608191915-0
  • bind-main-9.20.26-0.1.hum1
  • RHSA-2026:55437
  • RHSA-2026:60383
  • RHSA-2026:54509
  • RHSA-2026:54654
  • RHSA-2026:80501
  • RHSA-2026:79160
  • RHSA-2026:54510
  • RHSA-2026:55442
  • RHSA-2026:57189
  • RHSA-2026:55441
  • RHSA-2026:62549
  • RHSA-2026:70586
  • RHSA-2026:65851
  • RHSA-2026:70615
  • RHSA-2026:57362
  • RHSA-2026:54071

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 2 days ago·verify at source

Mitigation checklist

Recommended fix / mitigation
  • Disclaimer: The following mitigation notes are provided as a courtesy, pending the application of an official patch. This content was generated utilizing AI tools in conjunction with data from cmetaxonomy.org. Customers are advised to independently evaluate and test these temporary mitigations within their own infrastructure. ISC states no workarounds exist. Until patched, restrict the resolver to authorized client networks and deploy separate resolvers per trust zone. Memory hardening and auth controls don't apply — this is a DNS protocol logic error using validly-signed records.

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 2 days ago·verify at source

All Red Hat Linux advisories

Android app · Google Play

Monitor future Red Hat Linux CVEs from your phone.

Choose a whole vendor or a precise platform, then receive matching security advisories by phone notification, email, or both. Coverage follows 34 official vendor sources and 160+ reviewed platform categories.

Discussion(0)

No comments yet. Share field notes, upgrade gotchas, or questions — verify against the vendor advisory before acting on community advice.

Sign in to join the discussion.