Skip to content
VulniPulse
Advisory severityLow3.7Red Hat Linux

Low [CVE-2026-14935] webrtcbin accepts remote SDP without a=fingerprint due to inverted presence check

This low-severity Red Hat Linux advisory covers CVE-2026-14935 affecting Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.

Aggregated and source-linked by VulniPulse. Data sources, validation and limitations.

CVE-2026-14935 Source published Source updated

VulniPulse record published Record updated

CVE-2026-14935
Affected products & platforms
Red Hat LinuxRed Hat Enterprise Linux
Open source advisory

Summary

A logic vulnerability was found in GStreamer's webrtcbin component. The _check_sdp_crypto() function contains an inverted boolean condition that causes it to accept remote SDP offers or answers that lack the required a=fingerprint attribute, while incorrectly rejecting those that include it.

An attacker with the ability to intercept and modify WebRTC signaling messages could exploit this to bypass the SDP-level DTLS certificate fingerprint binding, weakening defenses against man-in-the-middle attacks on media streams.

This vulnerability is rated as Low severity because exploitation requires man-in-the-middle access to the WebRTC signaling channel, which is typically TLS-protected. Additionally, the DTLS layer may still independently validate certificates, limiting the practical impact of this bypass.

The webrtcbin component is shipped as part of gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8, 9, 10, and RHIVOS. The vulnerability weakens one layer of defense-in-depth but does not constitute a complete cryptographic break.

Red Hat severity: Low — CVSS 3.7 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N). Weakness: CWE-670.

Affected Red Hat products: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9. Red Hat does not currently list a fixing RHSA for this CVE.

Is CVE-2026-14935 exploited?

No exploitation is reported in the sources VulniPulse tracks: CVE-2026-14935 is not in the CISA KEV catalog (checked ) and this advisory does not report exploitation. That is not proof the vulnerability cannot be exploited.

How do I fix CVE-2026-14935?

The advisory VulniPulse tracks names no fixed release. Follow Red Hat's guidance for workarounds and updates.

Confirm against the vendor advisory before you patch.

Affected versions

No affected-version range was extracted from the source record. The vendor advisory is authoritative. Check it before change work.

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 13 days ago·verify at source

Fixed versions

No fixed release is recorded yet. That does not prove no patch exists. Confirm against the vendor advisory.

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 13 days ago·verify at source

Mitigation checklist

Recommended fix / mitigation
  • There is no complete mitigation for this vulnerability. The following measures can reduce risk: 1. Ensure WebRTC signaling channels use TLS encryption to prevent SDP modification in transit. 2. If WebRTC functionality is not required, remove the webrtcbin plugin shared object from the GStreamer plugins directory (typically /usr/lib64/gstreamer-1.0/libgstwebrtc.so).

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 13 days ago·verify at source

Get an email when Red Hat RHEL & SELinux publishes the next one.

See Red Hat RHEL & SELinux's last 90 days of advisories first. Then choose one product with live alerts free for life, or a free month of real-time alerts on everything with the severity, the fixed version and the vendor's link (card needed, then US$15/month; we email you before the first charge).

Alert me about Red Hat RHEL & SELinux
All Red Hat Linux advisories

iPhone and Android apps · New on the App Store

Monitor future Red Hat Linux CVEs from your phone.

Choose a whole vendor or a precise platform, then receive matching security advisories by phone notification, email, or both. Coverage follows 34 official vendor sources and 160+ reviewed platform categories.

Discussion(0)

No comments yet. Share field notes, upgrade gotchas, or questions — verify against the vendor advisory before acting on community advice.

Sign in to join the discussion.