Medium [CVE-2026-15043] DBI::SQL::Nano: DBI::SQL::Nano: Incorrect SQL operator evaluation can lead to incorrect data filtering.
This medium-severity Red Hat Linux advisory covers CVE-2026-15043 affecting Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.
Aggregated and source-linked by VulniPulse. Data sources, validation and limitations.
VulniPulse record published Record updated
Summary
DBI::SQL::Nano versions from 1.42 before 1.651 for Perl have inverted = SQL operators on text. DBI::SQL::Nano, DBI's built-in mini-SQL engine, evaluated WHERE predicates incorrectly in some cases.
In the non-numeric string branch of the is_matched method, = was evaluated using Perl's le operator. SQL::Nano is the fallback query engine for DBI's file-backed drivers (DBD::File, DBD::DBM, CSV-style drivers) whenever SQL::Statement is not installed, and is forced whenever DBI_SQL_NANO=1.
Queries over such tables use these predicates directly. The impact depends on the context.
Where an application relies on a WHERE clause to filter file-backed data for policy or authorization, an inverted = comparison silently returns the wrong rows.
This vulnerability occurs because the engine incorrectly evaluates SQL operators for text comparisons, specifically inverting the logic for "less than or equal to" and "greater than or equal to" operations.
This can lead to applications that rely on these comparisons for filtering data, such as for policy or authorization, silently returning incorrect results. A Moderate impact flaw in perl-DBI's SQL::Nano engine can lead to incorrect data filtering.
This issue arises when applications use file-backed drivers with SQL::Nano as the fallback SQL engine, causing text comparison operators (` =`) to be inverted.
Is CVE-2026-15043 exploited?
No exploitation is reported in the sources VulniPulse tracks: CVE-2026-15043 is not in the CISA KEV catalog (checked ) and this advisory does not report exploitation. That is not proof the vulnerability cannot be exploited.
How do I fix CVE-2026-15043?
The advisory VulniPulse tracks names no fixed release. Follow Red Hat's guidance for workarounds and updates.
Confirm against the vendor advisory before you patch.
- < 1.42
- < 1.651
Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 5 days ago·verify at source
Fixed versions
No fixed release is recorded yet. That does not prove no patch exists. Confirm against the vendor advisory.
Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 5 days ago·verify at source
Mitigation
The source record does not include mitigation steps. That does not mean no fix exists. Read the vendor advisory below for the authoritative guidance.
Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 5 days ago·verify at source
Get an email when Red Hat RHEL & SELinux publishes the next one.
See Red Hat RHEL & SELinux's last 90 days of advisories first. Then choose one product with live alerts free for life, or a free month of real-time alerts on everything with the severity, the fixed version and the vendor's link (card needed, then US$15/month; we email you before the first charge).
More Red Hat Linux advisories
- CVE-2026-111497Oct 22, 2026Out-of-Bounds Write in Google Brotli Decoder
- CVE-2026-109619Oct 21, 2026fatal error handling retains stale request state leading to use-after-free
- CVE-2026-109618Oct 21, 2026OOM bailout during request parsing leads to memory corruption and RCE
- CVE-2026-119977Oct 31, 2026Arbitrary code execution via predictable upgrade staging paths
- CVE-2026-97229Oct 13, 2026integer overflow issue in CI/CD regular expression compiler
- CVE-2026-64849Aug 17, 2026Unauthenticated full-read SSRF in webhook delivery: _validate_webhook_url bypassed
iPhone and Android apps · New on the App Store
Monitor future Red Hat Linux CVEs from your phone.
Choose a whole vendor or a precise platform, then receive matching security advisories by phone notification, email, or both. Coverage follows 34 official vendor sources and 160+ reviewed platform categories.
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Share field notes, upgrade gotchas, or questions — verify against the vendor advisory before acting on community advice.
Sign in to join the discussion.