Fix WARN_ON in __iommu_group_set_domain_nofail() due to reset
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: iommu: Fix WARN_ON in __iommu_group_set_domain_nofail() due to reset In __iommu_group_set_domain_internal(), concurrent domain attachments are rejected when any device in the group is recovering. This is necessary to fence concurrent attachments to a multi-device group where devices might share the same RID due to PCI DMA alias quirks, but triggers the WARN_ON in __iommu_group_set_domain_nofail(). Other IOMMU_SET_DOMAIN_MUST_SUCCEED callers in detach/teardown paths, such as __iommu_group_set_core_domain and __iommu_release_dma_ownership, should not be rejected, as the domain would be freed anyway in these nofail paths while group->domain is still pointing to it. So pci_dev_reset_iommu_done() could trigger a UAF when re-attaching group->domain. Honor the IOMMU_SET_DOMAIN_MUST_SUCCEED flag, allowing the callers through the group->recovery_cnt fence, so as to update the group->domain pointer. Instead add a gdev->blocked check in the device iteration loop, to prevent any concurrent per-device detachment. A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's Input/Output Memory Management Unit (IOMMU) subsystem, which manages how devices access system memory. A race condition, a situation where multiple operations occur in an unpredictable order, exists during device recovery when multiple memory domains are being attached concurrently. This can lead to a Use-After-Free (UAF) vulnerability, where the system attempts to use memory that has already been released, potentially allowing a local attacker to execute unauthorized code or cause the system to crash (denial of service). Red Hat severity: Important — CVSS 7 (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). Weakness: CWE-825. No fixing RHSA erratum has published yet; monitor the Red Hat CVE page and patch when it ships.
Mitigation checklist
- Red Hat rates this important; a fix erratum may not be out yet — apply the RHSA as soon as it publishes.
Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 7 hours ago·verify at source
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Share field notes, upgrade gotchas, or questions — verify against the vendor advisory before acting on community advice.
Sign in to join the discussion.