Skip to content
VulniPulse
Advisory severityHigh7.0Vendor: MediumRed Hat Linux

High [CVE-2026-52971] Fix potential use-after-free in get_timestamp

This high-severity Red Hat Linux advisory covers CVE-2026-52971 affecting Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9, Red Hat package: kernel-rt.

Aggregated and source-linked by VulniPulse. Data sources, validation and limitations.

CVE-2026-52971 Source published Source updated

VulniPulse record published Record updated

CVE-2026-52971
Affected products & platforms
Red Hat LinuxLinux Kernel
Open source advisory

Summary

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: ena: PHC: Fix potential use-after-free in get_timestamp Move the phc->active check and resp pointer assignment to after acquiring the spinlock. Previously, phc->active was checked without holding the lock, and resp was cached from ena_dev->phc.virt_addr before the lock was acquired.

If ena_com_phc_destroy() runs between the lockless active check and the lock acquisition, it sets active=false, releases the lock, frees the DMA memory, and sets virt_addr=NULL. The get_timestamp path would then read a NULL virt_addr and dereference it.

With both the active check and the pointer read under the lock, destroy cannot free the memory while get_timestamp is using it. A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's Elastic Network Adapter (ENA) driver, specifically within the Precision Time Protocol Hardware Clock (PHC) timestamp retrieval function.

A race condition exists where the `get_timestamp` function could attempt to access memory that has already been freed by the `ena_com_phc_destroy` function. This use-after-free vulnerability can lead to a NULL pointer dereference, potentially causing a system crash and resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

Red Hat severity: Moderate — CVSS 7 (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). Weakness: CWE-825.

Is CVE-2026-52971 exploited?

No exploitation is reported in the sources VulniPulse tracks: CVE-2026-52971 is not in the CISA KEV catalog (checked ) and this advisory does not report exploitation. That is not proof the vulnerability cannot be exploited.

How do I fix CVE-2026-52971?

Upgrade to a fixed release named by Red Hat:

  • kernel-0:6.12.0-211.56.1.el10_2
  • kernel-0:5.14.0-687.49.1.el9_8
  • RHSA-2026:68507
  • RHSA-2026:68570

Confirm against the vendor advisory before you patch.

Affected versions

No affected-version range was extracted from the source record. The vendor advisory is authoritative. Check it before change work.

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 14 days ago·verify at source

Fixed versions
  • kernel-0:6.12.0-211.56.1.el10_2
  • kernel-0:5.14.0-687.49.1.el9_8
  • RHSA-2026:68507
  • RHSA-2026:68570

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 14 days ago·verify at source

Mitigation checklist

Recommended fix / mitigation
  • For systems where the `ena` kernel module is not required, it can be blacklisted to prevent it from loading. Create a file such as `/etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-ena.conf` with the content `blacklist ena`. A system reboot is necessary for this change to take effect. Disabling the `ena` module may impact network functionality if Elastic Network Adapters are in use.

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 14 days ago·verify at source

Get an email when Red Hat Linux Kernel publishes the next one.

See Red Hat Linux Kernel's last 90 days of advisories first. Then choose one product with live alerts free for life, or a free month of real-time alerts on everything with the severity, the fixed version and the vendor's link (card needed, then US$15/month; we email you before the first charge).

Alert me about Red Hat Linux Kernel
All Red Hat Linux advisories

iPhone and Android apps · New on the App Store

Monitor future Red Hat Linux CVEs from your phone.

Choose a whole vendor or a precise platform, then receive matching security advisories by phone notification, email, or both. Coverage follows 34 official vendor sources and 160+ reviewed platform categories.

Discussion(0)

No comments yet. Share field notes, upgrade gotchas, or questions — verify against the vendor advisory before acting on community advice.

Sign in to join the discussion.