Medium [CVE-2026-53352] clear JOBCTL_PENDING_MASK for caller in zap_other_threads
This medium-severity Red Hat Linux advisory covers CVE-2026-53352 affecting Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.
Aggregated and source-linked by VulniPulse. Data sources, validation and limitations.
VulniPulse record published Record updated
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: signal: clear JOBCTL_PENDING_MASK for caller in zap_other_threads() When a multi-threaded process receives a stop signal (e.g., SIGSTOP), do_signal_stop() sets JOBCTL_STOP_PENDING and JOBCTL_STOP_CONSUME on all threads and sets signal->group_stop_count to the number of threads.
If one of the threads concurrently calls execve(), de_thread() invokes zap_other_threads() to kill all other threads. zap_other_threads() aborts the pending group stop by resetting signal->group_stop_count to 0 and clears the JOBCTL_PENDING_MASK for all other threads. However, it fails to clear the job control flags for the calling thread.
When execve() completes, the calling thread returns to user mode and checks for pending signals. Seeing the stale JOBCTL_STOP_PENDING flag, it calls do_signal_stop(), which invokes task_participate_group_stop().
This aligns with other functions that tear down a thread group and abort group stops, such as zap_process() and complete_signal(), which correctly clear these flags for all threads including the current one. This can occur when a multi-threaded process receives a stop signal, and one of its threads concurrently calls `execve()`.
The un-cleared flags can lead to an attempt to decrement an already-zero counter, triggering a kernel warning and resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).
Is CVE-2026-53352 exploited?
No exploitation is reported in the sources VulniPulse tracks: CVE-2026-53352 is not in the CISA KEV catalog (checked ) and this advisory does not report exploitation. That is not proof the vulnerability cannot be exploited.
How do I fix CVE-2026-53352?
The advisory VulniPulse tracks names no fixed release. Follow Red Hat's guidance for workarounds and updates.
Confirm against the vendor advisory before you patch.
Affected versions
No affected-version range was extracted from the source record. The vendor advisory is authoritative. Check it before change work.
Official advisory · medium-confidence parse· fetched 13 days ago·verify at source
Fixed versions
No fixed release is recorded yet. That does not prove no patch exists. Confirm against the vendor advisory.
Official advisory · medium-confidence parse· fetched 13 days ago·verify at source
Mitigation
The source record does not include mitigation steps. That does not mean no fix exists. Read the vendor advisory below for the authoritative guidance.
Official advisory · medium-confidence parse· fetched 13 days ago·verify at source
Get an email when Red Hat Linux Kernel publishes the next one.
See Red Hat Linux Kernel's last 90 days of advisories first. Then choose one product with live alerts free for life, or a free month of real-time alerts on everything with the severity, the fixed version and the vendor's link (card needed, then US$15/month; we email you before the first charge).
More Red Hat Linux advisories
- CVE-2026-111497Oct 22, 2026Out-of-Bounds Write in Google Brotli Decoder
- CVE-2026-109619Oct 21, 2026fatal error handling retains stale request state leading to use-after-free
- CVE-2026-109618Oct 21, 2026OOM bailout during request parsing leads to memory corruption and RCE
- CVE-2026-119977Oct 31, 2026Arbitrary code execution via predictable upgrade staging paths
- CVE-2026-97229Oct 13, 2026integer overflow issue in CI/CD regular expression compiler
- CVE-2026-64849Aug 17, 2026Unauthenticated full-read SSRF in webhook delivery: _validate_webhook_url bypassed
iPhone and Android apps · New on the App Store
Monitor future Red Hat Linux CVEs from your phone.
Choose a whole vendor or a precise platform, then receive matching security advisories by phone notification, email, or both. Coverage follows 34 official vendor sources and 160+ reviewed platform categories.
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Share field notes, upgrade gotchas, or questions — verify against the vendor advisory before acting on community advice.
Sign in to join the discussion.