High [CVE-2026-55968] Apache Thrift Node.js bindings: Denial of Service due to inefficient algorithmic complexity and resource allocation
This high-severity Red Hat Linux advisory covers CVE-2026-55968 affecting Confidential Compute Attestation, Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.
Aggregated and source-linked by VulniPulse. Data sources, validation and limitations.
VulniPulse record published Record updated
Android app · Google Play
Monitor future Red Hat Linux CVEs from your phone.
Choose a whole vendor or a precise platform, then receive matching security advisories by phone notification, email, or both. Coverage follows 32 official vendor sources and 160+ reviewed platform categories.
Summary
Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity, Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in Apache Thrift Node.js bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.24.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.24.0, which fixes the issue. By exploiting this, an attacker can consume excessive resources, making the service unavailable to legitimate users.
This flaw primarily impacts Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform components that utilize the vulnerable Thrift Node.js bindings, potentially leading to service unavailability. Red Hat severity: Important — CVSS 7.5 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).
Weakness: CWE-770. Affected Red Hat products: Confidential Compute Attestation; Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.
Red Hat lists Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3; Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4; Red Hat OpenShift Update Service as not affected. Red Hat does not currently list a fixing RHSA for this CVE.
- < 0.24.0
Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 12 days ago·verify at source
Mitigation checklist
- Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.
Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 12 days ago·verify at source
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Share field notes, upgrade gotchas, or questions — verify against the vendor advisory before acting on community advice.
Sign in to join the discussion.