Skip to content
VulniPulse
Low3.7Red Hat Linux

Low [CVE-2026-56368] ImageMagick - Memory Leak in Raw Pixel Data Coders

This low-severity Red Hat Linux advisory covers CVE-2026-56368 affecting Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7, Red Hat package: imagemagick.

CVE-2026-56368 Published Jun 24, 2026Updated by vendor Jun 24, 2026
Affected products & platforms
Red Hat LinuxRed Hat Enterprise Linux
Open vendor advisory

Android app · Google Play

Monitor future Red Hat Linux CVEs from your phone.

Choose a whole vendor or a precise platform, then receive matching security advisories by phone notification, email, or both. Coverage follows 32 official vendor sources and 160+ reviewed platform categories.

Matching phone alertsOptional email delivery

Summary

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-15 contains a memory leak vulnerability in multiple coders that write raw pixel data where allocated objects are not properly freed. Attackers can trigger this leak by processing specially crafted images, causing memory exhaustion and denial of service.

A flaw was found in ImageMagick. Red Hat severity: Low — CVSS 3.7 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L).

Affected Red Hat products: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7. Will not fix / out of support: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.

Red Hat does not currently list a fixing RHSA for this CVE.

Affected products named by the advisory: Red Hat package: imagemagick.

Affected versions
  • < 7.1.2-15

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 3 days ago·verify at source

Fixed versions

No fixed release is recorded yet. That does not prove no patch exists — confirm against the vendor advisory.

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 3 days ago·verify at source

Mitigation checklist

Recommended fix / mitigation
  • Modify the ImageMagick security policy file (policy.xml, typically located in /etc/ImageMagick-7/ or /etc/ImageMagick-6/) to disable the processing of RAW pixel data formats.

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 3 days ago·verify at source

Discussion(0)

No comments yet. Share field notes, upgrade gotchas, or questions — verify against the vendor advisory before acting on community advice.

Sign in to join the discussion.