Medium [CVE-2026-58469] Memory corruption via crafted Metalink URL
This medium-severity Red Hat Linux advisory covers CVE-2026-58469 affecting Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8, Red Hat package: wget.
Aggregated and source-linked by VulniPulse. Data sources, validation and limitations.
VulniPulse record published Record updated
Summary
GNU Wget through 1.25.0, fixed in commit 37a40fc, contains a heap buffer underread vulnerability in the clean_metalink_string() function within src/metalink.c that allows a malicious server to trigger memory corruption by serving a Metalink document containing a whitespace-only URL.
Attackers can cause the function to decrement a pointer past the start of the buffer when processing an all-whitespace Metalink URL, potentially leading to abnormal program behavior. This could lead to memory corruption and abnormal program behavior, potentially causing a denial of service.
Moderate: A heap-buffer-underread in GNU Wget's clean_metalink_string() function, affecting Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8, can be triggered when wget processes a specially crafted Metalink document containing a resource URL consisting only of whitespace characters.
This code path is only reachable when Wget's Metalink support is explicitly requested via --input-metalink or --metalink-over-http; it is not exercised during ordinary downloads. Successful exploitation requires a user to invoke Wget's Metalink handling against an attacker-controlled or compromised server.
The out-of-bounds byte is read only to decide whether to continue a trim loop and is never returned, logged, or written -- the practical impact is limited to a crash of the wget process (denial of service), not memory corruption or code execution.
Is CVE-2026-58469 exploited?
No exploitation is reported in the sources VulniPulse tracks: CVE-2026-58469 is not in the CISA KEV catalog (checked ) and this advisory does not report exploitation. That is not proof the vulnerability cannot be exploited.
How do I fix CVE-2026-58469?
Upgrade to a fixed release named by Red Hat:
- 1.25.0
- wget-0:1.19.5-16.el8_10
- RHSA-2026:62144
Confirm against the vendor advisory before you patch.
Affected versions
No affected-version range was extracted from the source record. The vendor advisory is authoritative. Check it before change work.
Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 11 days ago·verify at source
- 1.25.0
- wget-0:1.19.5-16.el8_10
- RHSA-2026:62144
Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 11 days ago·verify at source
Mitigation checklist
- Avoid using Wget's Metalink options (--input-metalink and --metalink-over-http) when downloading from untrusted or unverified servers. Since Metalink processing must be explicitly requested, omitting these options avoids the vulnerable code path entirely.
Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 11 days ago·verify at source
Get an email when Red Hat RHEL & SELinux publishes the next one.
See Red Hat RHEL & SELinux's last 90 days of advisories first. Then choose one product with live alerts free for life, or a free month of real-time alerts on everything with the severity, the fixed version and the vendor's link (card needed, then US$15/month; we email you before the first charge).
More Red Hat Linux advisories
- CVE-2026-111497Oct 22, 2026Out-of-Bounds Write in Google Brotli Decoder
- CVE-2026-119977Oct 31, 2026Arbitrary code execution via predictable upgrade staging paths
- CVE-2026-109619Oct 21, 2026fatal error handling retains stale request state leading to use-after-free
- CVE-2026-109618Oct 21, 2026OOM bailout during request parsing leads to memory corruption and RCE
- CVE-2026-97229Oct 13, 2026integer overflow issue in CI/CD regular expression compiler
- CVE-2026-64849Aug 17, 2026Unauthenticated full-read SSRF in webhook delivery: _validate_webhook_url bypassed
iPhone and Android apps · New on the App Store
Monitor future Red Hat Linux CVEs from your phone.
Choose a whole vendor or a precise platform, then receive matching security advisories by phone notification, email, or both. Coverage follows 34 official vendor sources and 160+ reviewed platform categories.
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Share field notes, upgrade gotchas, or questions — verify against the vendor advisory before acting on community advice.
Sign in to join the discussion.