Medium [CVE-2026-59920] Improper CR/LF neutralization in netty-codec-stomp
This medium-severity Red Hat Linux advisory covers CVE-2026-59920 affecting Red Hat build of Apache Camel for Spring Boot 4, Red Hat Data Grid 8, Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.
Aggregated and source-linked by VulniPulse. Data sources, validation and limitations.
VulniPulse record published Record updated
Summary
Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework.
In versions prior to 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, Netty's STOMP encoder ( StompSubframeEncoder ) does not escape or validate header values in CONNECT and CONNECTED frames, so raw newline ( \n ) characters in a header value are written directly to the wire, allowing an attacker who controls a header value to inject additional STOMP headers.
This happens because the encoder intentionally skips escaping for CONNECT/CONNECTED frames per the STOMP 1.2 specification but never rejects the raw newlines, and since a broker parses each line as a separate header, an attacker controlling a value such as a user-supplied login or passcode can overwrite connection parameters or add authentication/role headers to bypass authentication or escalate privileges (the actual impact is broker-dependent).
A flaw was found in the Netty STOMP (Streaming Text Oriented Messaging Protocol) decoder. This vulnerability allows a remote attacker to inject arbitrary protocol frames by crafting malformed STOMP commands that contain embedded carriage return (CR) and line feed (LF) sequences.
This bypasses message boundary checks and can lead to command injection, potentially compromising the integrity of the system. Red Hat severity: Moderate — CVSS 6.5 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N).
Weakness: CWE-93.
Is CVE-2026-59920 exploited?
No exploitation is reported in the sources VulniPulse tracks: CVE-2026-59920 is not in the CISA KEV catalog (checked ) and this advisory does not report exploitation. That is not proof the vulnerability cannot be exploited.
How do I fix CVE-2026-59920?
Upgrade to a fixed release named by Red Hat:
- 4.1.136
- 4.2.16
Confirm against the vendor advisory before you patch.
- < 4.1.136.Final
- < 4.2.16.Final
Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 3 days ago·verify at source
- 4.1.136
- 4.2.16
Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 3 days ago·verify at source
Mitigation checklist
- Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.
Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 3 days ago·verify at source
Get an email when Red Hat publishes the next one.
See Red Hat's last 90 days of advisories first. Then choose one product with live alerts free for life, or a free month of real-time alerts on everything with the severity, the fixed version and the vendor's link (card needed, then US$15/month; we email you before the first charge).
More Red Hat Linux advisories
- CVE-2026-34197Apr 7, 2026RCE via crafted discovery URI in Jolokia JMX-HTTP bridge
- CVE-2026-119977Oct 31, 2026Arbitrary code execution via predictable upgrade staging paths
- CVE-2026-111497Oct 22, 2026Out-of-Bounds Write in Google Brotli Decoder
- CVE-2026-109619Oct 21, 2026fatal error handling retains stale request state leading to use-after-free
- CVE-2026-109618Oct 21, 2026OOM bailout during request parsing leads to memory corruption and RCE
- CVE-2026-97229Oct 13, 2026integer overflow issue in CI/CD regular expression compiler
iPhone and Android apps · New on the App Store
Monitor future Red Hat Linux CVEs from your phone.
Choose a whole vendor or a precise platform, then receive matching security advisories by phone notification, email, or both. Coverage follows 34 official vendor sources and 160+ reviewed platform categories.
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Share field notes, upgrade gotchas, or questions — verify against the vendor advisory before acting on community advice.
Sign in to join the discussion.