High [CVE-2026-63939] Compute the correct max length of the in-GHCB scratch area
This high-severity Red Hat Linux advisory covers CVE-2026-63939 affecting Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9, Red Hat package: kernel.
Aggregated and source-linked by VulniPulse. Data sources, validation and limitations.
VulniPulse record published Record updated
Get an email when Red Hat Linux Linux Kernel publishes the next one.
See Red Hat Linux Linux Kernel's last 90 days of advisories first. Then choose one product with live alerts free for life, or a free month of real-time alerts on everything with the severity, the fixed version and the vendor's link (card needed, then US$15/month; we email you before the first charge).
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: SEV: Compute the correct max length of the in-GHCB scratch area When setting the length of the GHCB scratch area, and the area is in the GHCB shared buffer, set the effective length of the scratch area to the max possible size given the start of the guest-provided pointer, and the end of the shared buffer.
The code was "fine" when first introduced, as KVM doesn't consult the length of the buffer when emulating MMIO, because the passed in @len always specifies the *max* size required.
But for PSC requests, the incoming @len is just the minimum length (to process the header), and KVM needs to know the full size of the scratch area to avoid buffer overflows (spoiler alert). Opportunistically rename @len => @min_len to better reflect its role.
A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM) with Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) support. This vulnerability arises from an incorrect calculation of the maximum length for the in-Guest-Host Communication Block (GHCB) scratch area.
When processing Page State Change (PSC) requests, KVM uses a minimum length instead of the full required size, which can lead to a buffer overflow. A malicious guest operating system could potentially exploit this to cause a denial of service or escalate privileges on the host system.
Affected versions
No affected-version range was extracted from the source record. The vendor advisory is authoritative. Check it before change work.
Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 7 days ago·verify at source
Fixed versions
No fixed release is recorded yet. That does not prove no patch exists. Confirm against the vendor advisory.
Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 7 days ago·verify at source
Mitigation checklist
- Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.
Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 7 days ago·verify at source
More Red Hat Linux advisories
- CVE-2026-111497Oct 22, 2026Out-of-Bounds Write in Google Brotli Decoder
- CVE-2026-109619Oct 21, 2026fatal error handling retains stale request state leading to use-after-free
- CVE-2026-109618Oct 21, 2026OOM bailout during request parsing leads to memory corruption and RCE
- CVE-2026-53362Jul 4, 2026account for fraggap on the paged allocation path
- CVE-2026-119977Oct 31, 2026Arbitrary code execution via predictable upgrade staging paths
- CVE-2026-97229Oct 13, 2026integer overflow issue in CI/CD regular expression compiler
iPhone and Android apps · New on the App Store
Monitor future Red Hat Linux CVEs from your phone.
Choose a whole vendor or a precise platform, then receive matching security advisories by phone notification, email, or both. Coverage follows 34 official vendor sources and 160+ reviewed platform categories.
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Share field notes, upgrade gotchas, or questions — verify against the vendor advisory before acting on community advice.
Sign in to join the discussion.