Skip to content
VulniPulse
Advisory severityUnratedRed Hat Linux

Advisory [CVE-2026-64215] Check kzalloc return in a8xx_hfi_send_perf_table

This security Red Hat Linux advisory covers CVE-2026-64215.

Aggregated and source-linked by VulniPulse. Data sources, validation and limitations.

CVE-2026-64215 Source published Source updated

VulniPulse record published Record updated

Affected products & platforms
Red Hat LinuxUnclassified
Open source advisory

Android app · Google Play

Monitor future Red Hat Linux CVEs from your phone.

Choose a whole vendor or a precise platform, then receive matching security advisories by phone notification, email, or both. Coverage follows 32 official vendor sources and 160+ reviewed platform categories.

Matching phone alertsOptional email delivery

Summary

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/msm/a6xx: Check kzalloc return in a8xx_hfi_send_perf_table Check the return value of kzalloc() to prevent a NULL pointer dereference on allocation failure.

Patchwork: This vulnerability occurs because the `a8xx_hfi_send_perf_table` function does not properly check the return value of a memory allocation call (`kzalloc`). An attacker could potentially exploit this missing check to trigger a NULL pointer dereference, leading to a system crash and a denial of service.

Red Hat severity: not rated. Weakness: CWE-476.

Red Hat lists Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 as not affected.

Affected versions

No affected-version range was extracted from the source record. The vendor advisory is authoritative — check it before change work.

Official advisory · medium-confidence parse· fetched 13 days ago·verify at source

Fixed versions

No fixed release is recorded yet. That does not prove no patch exists — confirm against the vendor advisory.

Official advisory · medium-confidence parse· fetched 13 days ago·verify at source

Mitigation

The source record does not include mitigation steps. That is not a statement that no fix exists — read the vendor advisory below for the authoritative guidance.

Official advisory · medium-confidence parse· fetched 13 days ago·verify at source

Discussion(0)

No comments yet. Share field notes, upgrade gotchas, or questions — verify against the vendor advisory before acting on community advice.

Sign in to join the discussion.