Skip to content
VulniPulse
Advisory severityMedium5.5Vendor: LowRed Hat Linux

Medium [CVE-2026-64295] add count limit to page_ext_iter_next to prevent invalid PFN access

This medium-severity Red Hat Linux advisory covers CVE-2026-64295 affecting Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10, Red Hat package: kernel.

Aggregated and source-linked by VulniPulse. Data sources, validation and limitations.

CVE-2026-64295 Source published Source updated

VulniPulse record published Record updated

Affected products & platforms
Red Hat LinuxLinux Kernel
Open source advisory

Android app · Google Play

Monitor future Red Hat Linux CVEs from your phone.

Choose a whole vendor or a precise platform, then receive matching security advisories by phone notification, email, or both. Coverage follows 32 official vendor sources and 160+ reviewed platform categories.

Matching phone alertsOptional email delivery

Summary

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm: page_ext: add count limit to page_ext_iter_next to prevent invalid PFN access The page_ext iteration API does not validate if the PFN still belongs to a valid section while advancing the iterator.

When dynamically adding memory in the hotplug path, it can lead to a NULL pointer dereference during page_ext_lookup at the boundary of the last valid section when iterator count equals __pgcount. The for_each_page_ext() macro calls page_ext_iter_next() as its loop increment. for_each_page_ext() does a "__page_ext = page_ext_iter_next(&__iter)" at the end.

This causes page_ext_iter_next() to increment iter->index past __pgcount and call page_ext_lookup(start_pfn + __pgcount).

Affected products named by the advisory: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; Red Hat package: kernel.

Affected versions

No affected-version range was extracted from the source record. The vendor advisory is authoritative — check it before change work.

Official advisory · medium-confidence parse· fetched 10 days ago·verify at source

Fixed versions

No fixed release is recorded yet. That does not prove no patch exists — confirm against the vendor advisory.

Official advisory · medium-confidence parse· fetched 10 days ago·verify at source

Mitigation

The source record does not include mitigation steps. That is not a statement that no fix exists — read the vendor advisory below for the authoritative guidance.

Official advisory · medium-confidence parse· fetched 10 days ago·verify at source

Discussion(0)

No comments yet. Share field notes, upgrade gotchas, or questions — verify against the vendor advisory before acting on community advice.

Sign in to join the discussion.