Medium [CVE-2026-64535] Fix potential UAF when ddgst mismatch
This medium-severity Red Hat Linux advisory covers CVE-2026-64535 affecting Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.
Aggregated and source-linked by VulniPulse. Data sources, validation and limitations.
VulniPulse record published Record updated
Get an email when Red Hat Linux Linux Kernel publishes the next one.
See Red Hat Linux Linux Kernel's last 90 days of advisories first. Then choose the free weekly digest, or a free month of real-time alerts with the severity, the fixed version and the vendor's link (card needed, then US$15/month; we email you before the first charge).
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nvmet-tcp: Fix potential UAF when ddgst mismatch Shivam Kumar found via vulnerability testing: When data digest is enabled on an NVMe/TCP connection and a digest mismatch occurs on a non-final H2C_DATA PDU during an R2T-based data transfer, the digest error handler in nvmet_tcp_try_recv_ddgst() calls nvmet_req_uninit() — which performs percpu_ref_put() on the submission queue — but does NOT mark the command as completed.
It does not set cqe->status, does not modify rbytes_done, and does not clear any flag. When the subsequent fatal error triggers queue teardown, nvmet_tcp_uninit_data_in_cmds() iterates all commands, checks nvmet_tcp_need_data_in() for each one, and finds that the already-uninited command still appears to need data (because rbytes_done status == 0).
It therefore calls nvmet_req_uninit() a second time on the same command — a double percpu_ref_put against a single percpu_ref_get. A use-after-free flaw was found in the Linux kernel's NVMe-over-Fabrics TCP target (nvmet-tcp) driver.
This use-after-free and reference-count underflow can crash the kernel (denial of service) when a remote NVMe/TCP initiator triggers a digest mismatch against a host configured as an NVMe/TCP target.
Affected versions
No affected-version range was extracted from the source record. The vendor advisory is authoritative. Check it before change work.
Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 28 days ago·verify at source
Fixed versions
No fixed release is recorded yet. That does not prove no patch exists. Confirm against the vendor advisory.
Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 28 days ago·verify at source
Mitigation checklist
- There is no mitigation for this issue other than applying the kernel update once available. Because Red Hat does not support and does not enable the nvmet-tcp target functionality by default, systems that have not been explicitly configured with nvmetcli to act as an NVMe-over-Fabrics TCP target are not exposed and require no immediate action. Administrators who have deliberately configured an NVMe/TCP target using this unsupported functionality should restrict network access to the target port to trusted initiators on the same storage network only, and should consider disabling NVMe/TCP data digest or migrating off nvmet-tcp given its unmaintained status, until the fix is applied.
Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 28 days ago·verify at source
More Red Hat Linux advisories
- CVE-2026-111497Oct 22, 2026Out-of-Bounds Write in Google Brotli Decoder
- CVE-2026-109619Oct 21, 2026fatal error handling retains stale request state leading to use-after-free
- CVE-2026-109618Oct 21, 2026OOM bailout during request parsing leads to memory corruption and RCE
- CVE-2026-97229Oct 13, 2026integer overflow issue in CI/CD regular expression compiler
- CVE-2026-64849Aug 17, 2026Unauthenticated full-read SSRF in webhook delivery: _validate_webhook_url bypassed
- CVE-2026-53362Jul 4, 2026account for fraggap on the paged allocation path
Android app · Google Play
Monitor future Red Hat Linux CVEs from your phone.
Choose a whole vendor or a precise platform, then receive matching security advisories by phone notification, email, or both. Coverage follows 34 official vendor sources and 160+ reviewed platform categories.
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Share field notes, upgrade gotchas, or questions — verify against the vendor advisory before acting on community advice.
Sign in to join the discussion.