Skip to content
VulniPulse
Advisory severityHigh8.4Red Hat Linux

High [CVE-2026-66140] Privilege escalation via directory traversal due to mishandled queue-name arguments

This high-severity Red Hat Linux advisory covers CVE-2026-66140.

Aggregated and source-linked by VulniPulse. Data sources, validation and limitations.

CVE-2026-66140 Source published Source updated

VulniPulse record published Record updated

Affected products & platforms
Red Hat LinuxUnclassified
Open source advisory

Android app · Google Play

Monitor future Red Hat Linux CVEs from your phone.

Choose a whole vendor or a precise platform, then receive matching security advisories by phone notification, email, or both. Coverage follows 32 official vendor sources and 160+ reviewed platform categories.

Matching phone alertsOptional email delivery

Summary

Exim before 4.99.5 allows directory traversal to access files outside of the spool area, and consequently gain privileges, because arguments related to queue-name are mishandled. A flaw was found in Exim.

This Important flaw in Exim allows a local, unprivileged attacker to achieve privilege escalation through directory traversal. By exploiting mishandled queue-name arguments, an attacker can access sensitive files outside the intended spool area, increasing the risk of system compromise.

Red Hat severity: Important — CVSS 8.4 (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). Weakness: CWE-22.

Affected versions
  • < 4.99.5

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 11 days ago·verify at source

Fixed versions

No fixed release is recorded yet. That does not prove no patch exists — confirm against the vendor advisory.

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 11 days ago·verify at source

Mitigation checklist

Recommended fix / mitigation
  • Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 11 days ago·verify at source

Discussion(0)

No comments yet. Share field notes, upgrade gotchas, or questions — verify against the vendor advisory before acting on community advice.

Sign in to join the discussion.