High [CVE-2026-67201] Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) bypass due to URL parser differential
This high-severity Red Hat Linux advisory covers CVE-2026-67201.
Android app · Google Play
Monitor future Red Hat Linux CVEs from your phone.
Choose a whole vendor or a precise platform, then receive matching security advisories by phone notification, email, or both. Coverage follows 32 official vendor sources and 160+ reviewed platform categories.
Summary
V through 0.5.2, fixed in commit 85859f0, contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) bypass vulnerability that allows attackers to circumvent host-based allowlists by exploiting a parser differential between net.urllib and net.http.
Attackers can craft a URL containing a backslash in the authority section such that net.urllib.parse() extracts the trusted host for allowlist validation while net.http.get() normalizes the backslash and connects to the internal host, enabling access to internal network services that the allowlist was intended to block.
A flaw was found in V, specifically within its `net.urllib` and `net.http` components. This vulnerability allows a remote attacker to bypass host-based allowlists by exploiting a difference in how URLs are parsed.
By crafting a malicious URL with a backslash, an attacker can trick the system into validating a trusted host while actually connecting to an internal network service. This enables unauthorized access to internal resources that should otherwise be protected.
This flaw allows a remote attacker to circumvent host-based allowlists by exploiting a URL parser differential, enabling unauthorized access to internal network services. Applications utilizing these components for URL validation and fetching are at risk of exposing internal resources.
Affected versions
No affected-version range was extracted from the source record. The vendor advisory is authoritative — check it before change work.
Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 1 hour ago·verify at source
Mitigation checklist
- Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.
Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 1 hour ago·verify at source
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Share field notes, upgrade gotchas, or questions — verify against the vendor advisory before acting on community advice.
Sign in to join the discussion.