Skip to content
VulniPulse
Advisory severityMedium5.5Vendor: LowRed Hat Linux

Medium [CVE-2026-68450] free mapping node on duplicate reloc root insert

This medium-severity Red Hat Linux advisory covers CVE-2026-68450 affecting Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9, Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.

Aggregated and source-linked by VulniPulse. Data sources, validation and limitations.

CVE-2026-68450 Source published Source updated

VulniPulse record published Record updated

Affected products & platforms
Red Hat LinuxLinux Kernel
Open source advisory

Android app · Google Play

Monitor future Red Hat Linux CVEs from your phone.

Choose a whole vendor or a precise platform, then receive matching security advisories by phone notification, email, or both. Coverage follows 34 official vendor sources and 160+ reviewed platform categories.

Matching phone alertsOptional email delivery

Summary

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: free mapping node on duplicate reloc root insert __add_reloc_root() allocates a mapping_node before inserting it into rc->reloc_root_tree. If rb_simple_insert() finds an existing entry, it returns the existing rb_node and leaves the newly allocated node unlinked.

The error path then returns -EEXIST without freeing the new node. Since the node was never inserted into reloc_root_tree, the later cleanup in put_reloc_control() cannot find it either.

Free the newly allocated node before returning -EEXIST. The callers currently assert that -EEXIST should not happen, so this is a defensive cleanup for an unexpected duplicate insert path.

If the path is ever reached, the local allocation should still be released. When the `__add_reloc_root()` function attempts to insert a duplicate mapping node into the `reloc_root_tree`, the newly allocated node is not properly freed.

This oversight can lead to a memory leak, potentially causing resource exhaustion and a Denial of Service (DoS) over an extended period if this unexpected path is triggered. Red Hat has determined that this vulnerability does not pose a significant risk.

The memory leak occurs on a defensive error path that upstream callers assert should never be reached, and triggering btrfs relocation requires administrative privileges.

Affected versions

No affected-version range was extracted from the source record. The vendor advisory is authoritative — check it before change work.

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 1 day ago·verify at source

Fixed versions

No fixed release is recorded yet. That does not prove no patch exists — confirm against the vendor advisory.

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 1 day ago·verify at source

Mitigation checklist

Recommended fix / mitigation
  • There is no mitigation for this flaw. Systems not using btrfs filesystems are not affected in practice, as the vulnerable code path is only reached during btrfs block group relocation operations.

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 1 day ago·verify at source

Discussion(0)

No comments yet. Share field notes, upgrade gotchas, or questions — verify against the vendor advisory before acting on community advice.

Sign in to join the discussion.