Skip to content
VulniPulse
Advisory severityLow3.7Red Hat Linux

Low [CVE-2026-93590] Denial of Service via UHDR encoder policy bypass

This low-severity Red Hat Linux advisory covers CVE-2026-93590; related products: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7, Red Hat package: imagemagick.

Aggregated and source-linked by VulniPulse. Data sources, validation and limitations.

CVE-2026-93590 Source published Source updated

VulniPulse record published Record updated

Related products & platforms
Red Hat LinuxRed Hat Enterprise Linux
Open source advisory

Android app · Google Play

Monitor future Red Hat Linux CVEs from your phone.

Choose a whole vendor or a precise platform, then receive matching security advisories by phone notification, email, or both. Coverage follows 32 official vendor sources and 160+ reviewed platform categories.

Matching phone alertsOptional email delivery

Summary

Denial of Service via UHDR encoder policy bypass. Red Hat rates this low (CVSS 3.7).

Weakness: CWE-131.

Affected products named by the advisory: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7; Red Hat package: imagemagick.

Affected versions
  • < 7.1.2-31

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 8 days ago·verify at source

Fixed versions

No fixed release is recorded yet. That does not prove no patch exists — confirm against the vendor advisory.

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 8 days ago·verify at source

Mitigation checklist

Recommended fix / mitigation
  • To mitigate this issue, restrict ImageMagick's ability to process UHDR images by modifying the `policy.xml` configuration file. Add a policy entry to deny the UHDR coder, for example: `<policy domain="coder" rights="none" pattern="UHDR" />`. This change may require a service restart for applications that use ImageMagick to take effect and may impact functionality relying on UHDR image processing. Additionally, it is recommended to avoid processing untrusted image files with ImageMagick.

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 8 days ago·verify at source

Discussion(0)

No comments yet. Share field notes, upgrade gotchas, or questions — verify against the vendor advisory before acting on community advice.

Sign in to join the discussion.