Skip to content
VulniPulse
High7.4Red Hat Linux

High [CVE-2026-9697] Man-in-the-Middle attack via ignored TLS options with SOCKS5 proxy

This high-severity Red Hat Linux advisory covers CVE-2026-9697 affecting Cryostat 4 on RHEL 9, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.

CVE-2026-9697 Published Jun 17, 2026Updated by vendor Jun 17, 2026
Affected products & platforms
Red Hat LinuxUnclassified
Open vendor advisory

Android app · Google Play

Monitor future Red Hat Linux CVEs from your phone.

Choose a whole vendor or a precise platform, then receive matching security advisories by phone notification, email, or both. Coverage follows 32 official vendor sources and 160+ reviewed platform categories.

Matching phone alertsOptional email delivery

Summary

undici's ProxyAgent silently drops the requestTls option when configured with a SOCKS5 proxy URI (socks5:// or socks://). The target HTTPS connection through the SOCKS5 tunnel falls back to Node's default trust store, ignoring user-configured ca, cert, key, rejectUnauthorized, and servername settings.

Applications that pin to an internal or corporate CA via requestTls.ca will, when their proxy URI is SOCKS5, get the default Mozilla CA bundle as the trust anchor instead. Any cert signed by any publicly-trusted CA for the target hostname is accepted, breaking the intended pin and enabling MITM read and tamper of the HTTPS exchange.

Affected applications are those that use undici's ProxyAgent (or Socks5ProxyAgent directly) with SOCKS5 AND rely on requestTls for TLS scope restriction. The bug was introduced in undici 7.23.0 when SOCKS5 support was added.

Patches: Upgrade to undici v7.28.0 or v8.5.0. Workarounds: No workaround is available within the SOCKS5 path.

If a SOCKS5 proxy with TLS scope restriction is required and an upgrade is not yet possible, route the traffic through an HTTP-proxy ProxyAgent instead, where requestTls is honored correctly.

When undici's ProxyAgent is configured with a SOCKS5 proxy Uniform Resource Identifier (URI), it silently ignores Transport Layer Security (TLS) options, such as custom Certificate Authorities (CAs).

Affected versions

No affected-version range was extracted from the source record. The vendor advisory is authoritative — check it before change work.

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 16 days ago·verify at source

Fixed versions
  • 28.0
  • cryostat/cryostat-grafana-dashboard-rhel9:4.2.0-13
  • nodejs24-1:24.18.0-1.el10_2
  • nodejs:24-8100020260630152626.6d880403
  • nodejs:24-9080020260626074955.rhel9
  • cluster-observability-operator/distributed-tracing-console-plugin-pf4-rhel9:1782840519
  • cluster-observability-operator/distributed-tracing-console-plugin-pf5-rhel9:1782839981
  • cluster-observability-operator/distributed-tracing-console-plugin-pf6-rhel9:1782839193
  • cluster-observability-operator/distributed-tracing-console-plugin-rhel9:1782838753
  • cluster-observability-operator/logging-console-plugin-rhel9:1782841925
  • cluster-observability-operator/monitoring-console-plugin-pf5-rhel9:1782844225
  • cluster-observability-operator/monitoring-console-plugin-pf6-rhel9:1782839658
  • cluster-observability-operator/monitoring-console-plugin-rhel9:1782838476
  • cluster-observability-operator/troubleshooting-panel-console-plugin-rhel9:1782839494
  • rhdh/rhdh-hub-rhel9:1783448184
  • rhdh/rhdh-hub-rhel9:1784210921
  • nodejs26-main-26.3.0-1.2.hum1
  • rust-main-1.96.0-1.hum1
  • nodejs24-main-24.18.0-0.3.hum1
  • nodejs25-main-25.9.0-1.1.hum1
  • openshift4/ose-monitoring-plugin-rhel9:1783306396
  • devspaces/dashboard-rhel9:1782498792
  • devspaces/openvsx-rhel9:1783007534
  • devspaces/pluginregistry-rhel9:1782989367
  • devspaces/code-rhel9:1785245777
  • RHSA-2026:48151
  • RHSA-2026:35841
  • RHSA-2026:39868
  • RHSA-2026:35891
  • RHSA-2026:34342
  • RHSA-2026:36754
  • RHSA-2026:41929
  • RHSA-2026:22380
  • RHSA-2026:22934
  • RHSA-2026:38236
  • RHSA-2026:7378
  • RHSA-2026:36621
  • RHSA-2026:36820
  • RHSA-2026:48124

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 16 days ago·verify at source

Mitigation checklist

Recommended fix / mitigation
  • Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 16 days ago·verify at source

Discussion(0)

No comments yet. Share field notes, upgrade gotchas, or questions — verify against the vendor advisory before acting on community advice.

Sign in to join the discussion.