Skip to content
VulniPulse
Medium4.3Red Hat Linux

Medium [CVE-2026-9798] Keycloak: keycloak: brute-force protection bypass in ciba flow

This medium-severity Red Hat Linux advisory covers CVE-2026-9798 affecting Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4, Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.

CVE-2026-9798 Published May 28, 2026Updated by vendor Aug 5, 2026
Affected products & platforms
Red Hat LinuxUnclassified
Open vendor advisory

Android app · Google Play

Monitor future Red Hat Linux CVEs from your phone.

Choose a whole vendor or a precise platform, then receive matching security advisories by phone notification, email, or both. Coverage follows 32 official vendor sources and 160+ reviewed platform categories.

Matching phone alertsOptional email delivery

Summary

A flaw was found in Keycloak, an open-source identity and access management solution. When a user account is temporarily locked due to repeated failed login attempts, an attacker with valid client credentials can exploit the Client-Initiated Backchannel Authentication (CIBA) flow to bypass this brute-force protection.

This allows continued authentication attempts and token issuance even when the account should be locked, potentially enabling further unauthorized access attempts.

Affected products named by the advisory: Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4; Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.

Affected versions

No affected-version range was extracted from the source record. The vendor advisory is authoritative — check it before change work.

Official advisory · medium-confidence parse· fetched 2 hours ago·verify at source

Fixed versions

No fixed release is recorded yet. That does not prove no patch exists — confirm against the vendor advisory.

Official advisory · medium-confidence parse· fetched 2 hours ago·verify at source

Mitigation

The source record does not include mitigation steps. That is not a statement that no fix exists — read the vendor advisory below for the authoritative guidance.

Official advisory · medium-confidence parse· fetched 2 hours ago·verify at source

Discussion(0)

No comments yet. Share field notes, upgrade gotchas, or questions — verify against the vendor advisory before acting on community advice.

Sign in to join the discussion.