Skip to content
VulniPulse

Complete feed

Security advisories & CVEs

498 advisories across 32 monitored vendors.

Home overview

Android app · Google Play

Take your CVE monitoring with you.

Choose a whole vendor or a precise platform, then receive matching security advisories by phone notification, email, or both. Coverage follows 32 official vendor sources and 160+ reviewed platform categories.

High8.8Apache

High [CVE-2026-33858] Apache Airflow: Dag Authors, who normally should not be able to execute code in the webserver context could craft XCom payload

Dag Authors, who normally should not be able to execute code in the webserver context could craft XCom payload causing the webserver to execute arbitrary code. Since Dag Authors are already highly trusted, severity of this issue is Low. Users are recommended to upgrade to Apache Airflow 3.2.0, which resolves this issue.

CVE-2026-33858
Airflow
Apr 13, 2026
High7.5Apache

High [CVE-2025-66236] Before Airflow 3.2.0, it was unclear that secure Airflow deployments require the Deployment Manager to take appropriate actions…

Before Airflow 3.2.0, it was unclear that secure Airflow deployments require the Deployment Manager to take appropriate actions and pay attention to security details and security model of Airflow. Some assumptions the Deployment Manager could make were not clear or explicit enough, even though Airflow's intentions and security model of Airflow did not suggest different assumptions. The overall security model [1], workload isolation [2], and JWT authentication details [3] are now described in more detail. Users concerned with role isolation and following the Airflow security model of Airflow are advised to upgrade to Airflow 3.2, where several security improvements have been implemented. They should also read and follow the relevant documents to make sure that their deployment is secure enough. It also clarifies that the Deployment Manager is ultimately responsible for securing your Airflow deployment. This had also been communicated via Airflow 3.2.0 Blog announcement [4]. [3] JWT Token authentication: Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.2.0, which fixes this issue.

CVE-2025-66236
Airflow
Apr 13, 2026
High7.1Apache

High [CVE-2026-34476] Apache SkyWalking MCP: Server-Side Request Forgery via SW-URL Header vulnerability in Apache SkyWalking MCP.

Server-Side Request Forgery via SW-URL Header vulnerability in Apache SkyWalking MCP. This issue affects Apache SkyWalking MCP: 0.1.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.2.0, which fixes this issue.

CVE-2026-34476
Unclassified
Apr 13, 2026
High8.8Apache

High [CVE-2026-35337] Apache Storm: Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Apache Storm.

Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Apache Storm. Versions Affected: before 2.8.6. When processing topology credentials submitted via the Nimbus Thrift API, Storm deserializes the base64-encoded TGT blob using ObjectInputStream.readObject() without any class filtering or validation. An authenticated user with topology submission rights could supply a crafted serialized object in the "TGT" credential field, leading to remote code execution in both the Nimbus and Worker JVMs.

CVE-2026-35337
Unclassified
Apr 13, 2026
Medium5.4Apache

Medium [CVE-2026-35565] Apache Storm UI: Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)

Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Unsanitized Topology Metadata in Apache Storm UI Versions Affected: before 2.8.6 The Storm UI visualization component interpolates topology metadata including component IDs, stream names, and grouping values directly into HTML via innerHTML in parseNode() and parseEdge() without sanitization at any layer. An authenticated user with topology submission rights could craft a topology containing malicious HTML/JavaScript in component identifiers (e.g., a bolt ID containing an onerror event handler). This payload flows through Nimbus → Thrift → the Visualization API → vis.js tooltip rendering, resulting in stored cross-site scripting. In multi-tenant deployments where topology submission is available to less-trusted users but the UI is accessed by operators or administrators, this enables privilege escalation through script execution in an admin's browser session. Mitigation: 2.x users should upgrade to 2.8.6. A guide on how to do this is available in the release notes of 2.8.6. Credit: This issue was discovered while investigating another report by K.

CVE-2026-35565
Unclassified
Apr 13, 2026
High7.5Apache

High [CVE-2026-39304] Apache ActiveMQ Client, Apache ActiveMQ Broker, Apache ActiveMQ All, Apache ActiveMQ: Incorrect handling of TLSv1.3 KeyUpdate can be exploited to cause DoS via OOM

Denial of Service via Out of Memory vulnerability in Apache ActiveMQ Client, Apache ActiveMQ Broker, Apache ActiveMQ. ActiveMQ NIO SSL transports do not correctly handle TLSv1.3 handshake KeyUpdates triggered by clients. This makes it possible for a client to rapidly trigger updates which causes the broker to exhaust all its memory in the SSL engine leading to DoS. Note: TLS versions before TLSv1.3 (such as TLSv1.2) are broken but are not vulnerable to OOM. Previous TLS versions require a full handshake renegotiation which causes a connection to hang but not OOM. This is fixed as well. This issue affects Apache ActiveMQ Client: before 5.19.4, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.4; Apache ActiveMQ Broker: before 5.19.4, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.4; Apache ActiveMQ: before 5.19.4, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.4. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 6.2.4 or 5.19.5, which fixes the issue. Affected products named by the advisory: Apache ActiveMQ All.

CVE-2026-39304
MessagingActiveMQ
Apr 10, 2026
Medium6.3Apache

Medium [CVE-2026-40023] Apache Log4cxx's XMLLayout https://logging.apache.org/log4cxx/1.7.0/classlog4cxx_1_1xml_1_1XMLLayout.html , in versions before…

Apache Log4cxx's XMLLayout, in versions before 1.7.0, fails to sanitize characters forbidden by the XML 1.0 specification in log messages, NDC, and MDC property keys and values, producing invalid XML output. Conforming XML parsers must reject such documents with a fatal error, which may cause downstream log processing systems to drop or fail to index affected records. An attacker who can influence logged data can exploit this to suppress individual log records, impairing audit trails and detection of malicious activity. Users are advised to upgrade to Apache Log4cxx 1.7.0, which fixes this issue.

CVE-2026-40023
Unclassified
Apr 10, 2026
Medium6.3Apache

Medium [CVE-2026-40021] Apache Log4net's XmlLayout https://logging.apache.org/log4net/manual/configuration/layouts.html#layout-list and…

Apache Log4net's XmlLayout and XmlLayoutSchemaLog4J, in versions before 3.3.0, fail to sanitize characters forbidden by the XML 1.0 specification in MDC property keys and values, as well as the identity field that may carry attacker-influenced data. This causes an exception during serialization and the silent loss of the affected log event. An attacker who can influence any of these fields can exploit this to suppress individual log records, impairing audit trails and detection of malicious activity. Users are advised to upgrade to Apache Log4net 3.3.0, which fixes this issue.

CVE-2026-40021
Log4j
Apr 10, 2026
Medium6.3Apache

Medium [CVE-2026-34481] Apache Log4j's JsonTemplateLayout https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/json-template-layout.html , in versions up to and…

Apache Log4j's JsonTemplateLayout, in versions up to and including 2.25.3, produces invalid JSON output when log events contain non-finite floating-point values (NaN, Infinity, or -Infinity), which are prohibited by RFC 8259. This may cause downstream log processing systems to reject or fail to index affected records. An attacker can exploit this issue only if both of the following conditions are met: - The application uses JsonTemplateLayout. - The application logs a MapMessage containing an attacker-controlled floating-point value. Users are advised to upgrade to Apache Log4j JSON Template Layout 2.25.4, which corrects this issue.

CVE-2026-34481
Log4j
Apr 10, 2026
Medium6.9Apache

Medium [CVE-2026-34480] Apache Log4j Core's XmlLayout https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/layouts.html#XmlLayout , in versions up to and…

Apache Log4j Core's XmlLayout, in versions up to and including 2.25.3, fails to sanitize characters forbidden by the XML 1.0 specification producing invalid XML output whenever a log message or MDC value contains such characters. The impact depends on the StAX implementation in use: - JRE built-in StAX: Forbidden characters are silently written to the output, producing malformed XML. Conforming parsers must reject such documents with a fatal error, which may cause downstream log-processing systems to drop the affected records. - Alternative StAX implementations (e.g., Woodstox, a transitive dependency of the Jackson XML Dataformat module): An exception is thrown during the logging call, and the log event is never delivered to its intended appender, only to Log4j's internal status logger. Users are advised to upgrade to Apache Log4j Core 2.25.4, which corrects this issue by sanitizing forbidden characters before XML output.

CVE-2026-34480
Log4j
Apr 10, 2026
Medium6.9Apache

Medium [CVE-2026-34479] The Log4j1XmlLayout from the Apache Log4j 1-to-Log4j 2 bridge fails to escape characters forbidden by the XML 1.0 standard…

The Log4j1XmlLayout from the Apache Log4j 1-to-Log4j 2 bridge fails to escape characters forbidden by the XML 1.0 standard, producing malformed XML output. Conforming XML parsers are required to reject documents containing such characters with a fatal error, which may cause downstream log processing systems to drop or fail to index affected records. Two groups of users are affected: - Those using Log4j1XmlLayout directly in a Log4j Core 2 configuration file. - Those using the Log4j 1 configuration compatibility layer with org.apache.log4j.xml.XMLLayout specified as the layout class. Users are advised to upgrade to Apache Log4j 1-to-Log4j 2 bridge version 2.25.4, which corrects this issue. Note: The Apache Log4j 1-to-Log4j 2 bridge is deprecated and will not be present in Log4j 3. Users are encouraged to consult the Log4j 1 to Log4j 2 migration guide, and specifically the section on eliminating reliance on the bridge.

CVE-2026-34479
Log4j
Apr 10, 2026
Medium6.9Apache

Medium [CVE-2026-34478] Apache Log4j Core's Rfc5424Layout https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/layouts.html#RFC5424Layout , in versions 2.21.0…

Apache Log4j Core's Rfc5424Layout, in versions 2.21.0 through 2.25.3, is vulnerable to log injection via CRLF sequences due to undocumented renames of security-relevant configuration attributes. Two distinct issues affect users of stream-based syslog services who configure Rfc5424Layout directly: - The newLineEscape attribute was silently renamed, causing newline escaping to stop working for users of TCP framing (RFC 6587), exposing them to CRLF injection in log output. - The useTlsMessageFormat attribute was silently renamed, causing users of TLS framing (RFC 5425) to be silently downgraded to unframed TCP (RFC 6587), without newline escaping. Users of the SyslogAppender are not affected, as its configuration attributes were not modified. Users are advised to upgrade to Apache Log4j Core 2.25.4, which corrects this issue.

CVE-2026-34478
Log4j
Apr 10, 2026
Medium6.3Apache

Medium [CVE-2025-68161 +1] Apache Log4j: The fix for CVE-2025-68161 https://logging.apache.org/security.html#CVE-2025-68161 was incomplete: it addressed hostname…

The fix for CVE-2025-68161 was incomplete: it addressed hostname verification only when enabled via the log4j2.sslVerifyHostName system property, but not when configured through the verifyHostName attribute of the element. Although the verifyHostName configuration attribute was introduced in Log4j Core 2.12.0, it was silently ignored in all versions through 2.25.3, leaving TLS connections vulnerable to interception regardless of the configured value. A network-based attacker may be able to perform a man-in-the-middle attack when all of the following conditions are met: - An SMTP, Socket, or Syslog appender is in use. - TLS is configured via a nested element. - The attacker can present a certificate issued by a CA trusted by the appender's configured trust store, or by the default Java trust store if none is configured. This issue does not affect users of the HTTP appender, which uses a separate verifyHostname attribute that was not subject to this bug and verifies host names by default. Users are advised to upgrade to Apache Log4j Core 2.25.4, which corrects this issue.

CVE-2025-68161CVE-2026-34477
Log4j
Apr 10, 2026
Critical9.1Apache

Critical [CVE-2026-29145] Apache Tomcat: CLIENT_CERT authentication does not fail as expected for some scenarios

CLIENT_CERT authentication does not fail as expected for some scenarios when soft fail is disabled vulnerability in Apache Tomcat, Apache Tomcat Native. This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.18, from 10.1.0-M7 through 10.1.52, from 9.0.83 through 9.0.115; Apache Tomcat Native: from 1.1.23 through 1.1.34, from 1.2.0 through 1.2.39, from 1.3.0 through 1.3.6, from 2.0.0 through 2.0.13. Users are recommended to upgrade to version Tomcat Native 1.3.7 or 2.0.14 and Tomcat 11.0.20, 10.1.53 and 9.0.116, which fix the issue.

CVE-2026-29145
Tomcat
Apr 9, 2026
Critical9.1Apache

Critical [CVE-2025-57735] Airflow: When user logged out, the JWT token the user had authtenticated with was not invalidated, which could

When user logged out, the JWT token the user had authtenticated with was not invalidated, which could lead to reuse of that token in case it was intercepted. In Airflow 3.2 we implemented the mechanism that implements token invalidation at logout. Users who are concerned about the logout scenario and possibility of intercepting the tokens, should upgrade to Airflow 3.2+ Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.2.0, which fixes this issue.

CVE-2025-57735
Airflow
Apr 9, 2026
High7.5Apache

High [CVE-2026-34487] Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File vulnerability in the cloud membership for clustering component of Apache Tomcat…

Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File vulnerability in the cloud membership for clustering component of Apache Tomcat exposed the Kubernetes bearer token. This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.20, from 10.1.0-M1 through 10.1.53, from 9.0.13 through 9.0.116. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.21, 10.1.54 or 9.0.117, which fix the issue.

CVE-2026-34487
Tomcat
Apr 9, 2026
High7.5Apache Exploited CISA KEV

High [CVE-2026-29146 +1] Apache Tomcat: Fix for CVE-2026-29146 allowed bypass of EncryptInterceptor

Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data vulnerability in Apache Tomcat due to the fix for CVE-2026-29146 allowing the bypass of the EncryptInterceptor. This issue affects Apache Tomcat: 11.0.20, 10.1.53, 9.0.116. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.21, 10.1.54 or 9.0.117, which fix the issue.

CVE-2026-29146CVE-2026-34486
Tomcat
Apr 9, 2026
High7.5Apache

High [CVE-2026-34483] Apache Tomcat: Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output vulnerability in the JsonAccessLogValve component of Apache Tomcat.

Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output vulnerability in the JsonAccessLogValve component of Apache Tomcat. This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.20, from 10.1.0-M1 through 10.1.53, from 9.0.40 through 9.0.116. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.21, 10.1.54 or 9.0.117, which fix the issue.

CVE-2026-34483
Tomcat
Apr 9, 2026
High7.5Apache

High [CVE-2026-29146] Apache Tomcat: EncryptInterceptor vulnerable to padding oracle attack by default

Padding Oracle vulnerability in Apache Tomcat's EncryptInterceptor with default configuration. This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.18, from 10.0.0-M1 through 10.1.52, from 9.0.13 through 9..115, from 8.5.38 through 8.5.100, from 7.0.100 through 7.0.109. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.19, 10.1.53 and 9.0.116, which fixes the issue.

CVE-2026-29146
Tomcat
Apr 9, 2026
High7.5Apache

High [CVE-2026-29129] Apache Tomcat: Configured cipher preference order not preserved vulnerability in Apache Tomcat.

Configured cipher preference order not preserved vulnerability in Apache Tomcat. This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.16 through 11.0.18, from 10.1.51 through 10.1.52, from 9.0.114 through 9.0.115. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.20, 10.1.53 or 9.0.116, which fix the issue.

CVE-2026-29129
Tomcat
Apr 9, 2026