Skip to content
VulniPulse

Complete feed

Recently updated

Advisories the vendor has revised

Home overview

Android app · Google Play

Take your CVE monitoring with you.

Choose a whole vendor or a precise platform, then receive matching security advisories by phone notification, email, or both. Coverage follows 32 official vendor sources and 160+ reviewed platform categories.

High7.3GitLab

High [CVE-2026-13320] GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 15.7 before 18.11.7, 19.0 before 19.0.4, and 19.1 before 19.1.2 that under certain conditions could have allowed an authenticated user to execute arbitrary scripts in another user's browser session due to improper sanitization of user-supplied input

GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 15.7 before 18.11.7, 19.0 before 19.0.4, and 19.1 before 19.1.2 that under certain conditions could have allowed an authenticated user to execute arbitrary scripts in another user's browser session due to improper sanitization of user-supplied input.

CVE-2026-13320
GitLab CE / EE
Jul 8, 2026
HighCisco

High [CVE-2026-20146 +6] Cisco Advance Notification for Publication of July 15, 2026, Security Advisories

On July 15, 2026, the Cisco Product Security Incident Response Team (PSIRT) published the following advisories: Cisco Security Advisory CVE ID Security Impact Rating CVSS Base Score Cisco RoomOS Security Hardening Release: July 2026 High 8.8 Cisco Identity Services Engine Path Traversal Vulnerability Medium 5.5 To fully remediate the vulnerabilities that were disclosed on July 15, 2026, Cisco strongly recommends that customers upgrade to the fixed software that is indicated in the advisories. For more information about changes in Cisco PSIRT vulnerability disclosure, see Strengthening the Foundation: A Predictable, Customer-Focused Response to AI-Accelerated Vulnerability Discovery.

CVE-2026-20146CVE-2026-20150CVE-2026-20153+4
Identity Services Engine
Jul 8, 2026
High8.7Vendor: MediumPalo Alto

High [CVE-2026-0277] Prisma Access Agent: Improper Certificate Validation on iOS

CVE-2026-0277 Prisma Access Agent: Improper Certificate Validation on iOS

CVE-2026-0277
Prisma Access
Jul 8, 2026
High8.5Vendor: MediumPalo Alto

High [CVE-2026-0286] PAN-OS: Authenticated Command Injection in CLI

CVE-2026-0286 PAN-OS: Authenticated Command Injection in CLI

CVE-2026-0286
PAN-OSFirewallPAN-OS / Panorama
Jul 8, 2026
High8.4Vendor: MediumPalo Alto

High [CVE-2026-0278] Prisma Access Agent: Multiple DLP Policy Bypass Vulnerabilities on Windows

CVE-2026-0278 Prisma Access Agent: Multiple DLP Policy Bypass Vulnerabilities on Windows

CVE-2026-0278
Prisma Access
Jul 8, 2026
HighPalo Alto Exploited CISA KEV

High [CVE-2026-0275 +529] PAN-SA-2026-0010 Chromium and Prisma Browser: Monthly Vulnerability Update (July 2026)

PAN-SA-2026-0010 Chromium and Prisma Browser: Monthly Vulnerability Update (July 2026)

CVE-2026-0275CVE-2026-10881CVE-2026-10882+527
Unclassified
Jul 8, 2026
High7.0Vendor: MediumPalo Alto

High [CVE-2026-0285] PAN-OS: Server-Side Request Forgery Vulnerability in Management Web Interface

CVE-2026-0285 PAN-OS: Server-Side Request Forgery Vulnerability in Management Web Interface

CVE-2026-0285
PAN-OSFirewallPAN-OS / Panorama
Jul 8, 2026
High7.8Vendor: MediumPalo Alto

High [CVE-2026-0283] PAN-OS: Authentication Bypass Vulnerability in Large Scale VPN (LSVPN)

CVE-2026-0283 PAN-OS: Authentication Bypass Vulnerability in Large Scale VPN (LSVPN)

CVE-2026-0283
PAN-OSFirewallPAN-OS / Panorama
Jul 8, 2026
High8.7Vendor: MediumPalo Alto

High [CVE-2026-0287] PAN-OS: Denial of Service Vulnerabilities in Network Traffic Processing

CVE-2026-0287 PAN-OS: Denial of Service Vulnerabilities in Network Traffic Processing Affected products named by the advisory: Cloud NGFW; Prisma Access.

CVE-2026-0287
PAN-OSFirewallPrisma AccessCloud NGFW
Jul 8, 2026
High7.8Vendor: MediumPalo Alto

High [CVE-2026-0284] PAN-OS: XML Injection Vulnerability in Large Scale VPN (LSVPN)

CVE-2026-0284 PAN-OS: XML Injection Vulnerability in Large Scale VPN (LSVPN)

CVE-2026-0284
PAN-OSFirewallPAN-OS / Panorama
Jul 8, 2026
High7.3Apache

High [CVE-2026-43825] Untrusted Java Deserialization in Apache OpenNLP SvmDoccatModel Versions Affected: before 3.0.0-M4 (libsvm document…

Untrusted Java Deserialization in Apache OpenNLP SvmDoccatModel Versions Affected: before 3.0.0-M4 (libsvm document categorization module; introduced in OPENNLP-1808 and only present on the 3.x line) Description: SvmDoccatModel.deserialize(InputStream) reads an attacker-controlled stream with java.io.ObjectInputStream and calls readObject() without an ObjectInputFilter installed. ObjectInputStream materialises every class referenced in the stream before the resulting object is cast to SvmDoccatModel, so the cast that follows readObject() executes only after the foreign object graph has already been deserialised in full. If a Java deserialization gadget chain is available on the consumer's classpath, a crafted payload supplied to deserialize() executes arbitrary code in the JVM that loads it. Apache OpenNLP itself does not ship a known gadget chain, so the realistic risk is to downstream applications that embed the libsvm module alongside vulnerable transitive dependencies. The method is public and static, so any caller can pass an untrusted stream to it directly. The practical impact is remote code execution against processes that load SvmDoccatModel instances from untrusted or semi-trusted origins. Mitigation: 3.x users should upgrade to 3.0.0-M4.

CVE-2026-43825
Unclassified
Jul 6, 2026
High8.1Apache

High [CVE-2026-49297] Apache Airflow's Google provider operators `GCSToSFTPOperator` and `GCSTimeSpanFileTransformOperator` joined GCS…

Apache Airflow's Google provider operators `GCSToSFTPOperator` and `GCSTimeSpanFileTransformOperator` joined GCS object names returned by the bucket listing API directly to a destination filesystem path without normalisation or containment check. A user with write access to the source GCS bucket (typically a different trust principal than the DAG author — partner uploads, ingest-only service accounts, public-data buckets) could create an object whose name contains `..` segments and cause the DAG run to write the downloaded blob outside the configured destination (the SFTP `destination_path` for `GCSToSFTPOperator`; the worker-local temp directory for `GCSTimeSpanFileTransformOperator`), enabling overwrite of arbitrary files on the SFTP server or the worker host. Affects deployments that ingest from buckets writable by less-trusted principals. Users are advised to upgrade to `apache-airflow-providers-google` 22.2.1 or later.

CVE-2026-49297
Airflow
Jul 6, 2026
High7.3Apache

High [CVE-2026-49042] Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Camel

Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Camel. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.8.0 through 4.18.2, from 4.19.0 through 4.20.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.18.3, 4.21.0, which fixes the issue.

CVE-2026-49042
Messaging
Jul 6, 2026
High7.3Apache

High [CVE-2026-46588] Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Camel

Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Camel. This issue affects Apache Camel: through 4.14.7, from 4.15.0 through 4.18.2, from 4.19.0 through 4.20.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.14.8, 4.18.3, 4.21.0, which fixes the issue.

CVE-2026-46588
Messaging
Jul 6, 2026
High7.5Apache

High [CVE-2026-55994] Apache Camel: Improper Input Validation, Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor, Server-Side Request Forgery…

Improper Input Validation, Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor, Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache Camel in Iggy component. The camel-iggy consumer mapped the user-headers of inbound Iggy messages into the Camel Exchange header map without applying any HeaderFilterStrategy (IggyFetchRecords copied the message user-headers straight into the Exchange). Because nothing blocked the Camel header namespace, an actor able to publish to the consumed Iggy stream/topic could set Camel-internal control headers - including CamelHttpUri (Exchange.HTTP_URI) - simply by supplying them as message user-headers. In a route where the Iggy consumer feeds a downstream HTTP producer, the injected CamelHttpUri redirects the server-side HTTP request to an attacker-chosen destination (server-side request forgery - for example to an internal service or a cloud metadata endpoint). In addition, the HTTP producer resolves Camel property placeholders on the resulting (attacker-controlled) URI, so placeholders embedded in the injected value - such as an environment-variable reference, an application property, or a vault reference - are resolved to their real values and sent to the attacker, disclosing environment variables, application properties and vault secrets. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.17.0 before 4.18.3, from 4.19.0 before 4.21.0.

CVE-2026-55994
Messaging
Jul 6, 2026
High7.5Apache

High [CVE-2026-55993] Apache Camel: Improper Input Validation, Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor, Server-Side Request Forgery…

Improper Input Validation, Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor, Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache Camel in Atmosphere Websocket Component. The camel-atmosphere-websocket consumer mapped inbound WebSocket query parameters into the Camel Exchange header map without applying any HeaderFilterStrategy (WebsocketConsumer.sendEventNotification() iterates the query-string map collected in WebsocketConsumer.service() and copies each entry into the Exchange). Because nothing blocked the Camel header namespace, a client connecting to the WebSocket endpoint could set Camel-internal control headers - including CamelHttpUri (Exchange.HTTP_URI) - simply by supplying them as query parameters. In a route where the WebSocket consumer feeds a downstream HTTP producer, the injected CamelHttpUri redirects the server-side HTTP request to an attacker-chosen destination (server-side request forgery - for example to an internal service or a cloud metadata endpoint). In addition, the HTTP producer resolves Camel property placeholders on the resulting (attacker-controlled) URI, so placeholders embedded in the injected value - such as an environment-variable reference, an application property, or a vault reference - are resolved to their real values and sent to the attacker, disclosing environment variables, application properties and vault secrets.

CVE-2026-55993
Messaging
Jul 6, 2026
High7.5Apache

High [CVE-2026-46726] Apache Camel: Improper Input Validation, Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor, Server-Side Request Forgery…

Improper Input Validation, Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor, Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache Camel in Vertx Websocket component. The camel-vertx-websocket consumer mapped inbound WebSocket query and path parameters into the Camel Exchange header map without applying any HeaderFilterStrategy (VertxWebsocketConsumer.populateExchangeHeaders()). Because nothing blocked the Camel header namespace, a client connecting to the WebSocket endpoint could set Camel-internal control headers - including CamelHttpUri (Exchange.HTTP_URI) - simply by supplying them as query parameters. In a route where the WebSocket consumer feeds a downstream HTTP producer, the injected CamelHttpUri redirects the server-side HTTP request to an attacker-chosen destination (server-side request forgery - for example to an internal service or a cloud metadata endpoint). In addition, the HTTP producer resolves Camel property placeholders on the resulting (attacker-controlled) URI, so placeholders embedded in the injected value - such as an environment-variable reference, an application property, or a vault reference - are resolved to their real values and sent to the attacker, disclosing environment variables, application properties and vault secrets.

CVE-2026-46726
Messaging
Jul 6, 2026
High7.5Apache

High [CVE-2026-46592] Improper Input Validation, Unintended Proxy or Intermediary ('Confused Deputy') vulnerability in Apache Camel CXF SOAP…

Improper Input Validation, Unintended Proxy or Intermediary ('Confused Deputy') vulnerability in Apache Camel CXF SOAP component. The camel-cxf producer selects which SOAP operation to invoke on the backend service from the operationName (and operationNamespace) Exchange header, whose constant values (CxfConstants.OPERATION_NAME / OPERATION_NAMESPACE) were the plain strings operationName / operationNamespace. Because these names do not start with the Camel / camel prefix, HttpHeaderFilterStrategy - which blocks only the Camel header namespace on the HTTP boundary - let them pass from an inbound HTTP request straight into the Exchange. In a route that bridges an HTTP consumer (for example platform-http) into a cxf: producer, any HTTP client could therefore set the operationName header and have CxfProducer resolve and invoke a different WSDL operation than the route intended - for example replacing a read operation with a destructive one - against the backend SOAP service (a confused-deputy redirection). The constant is defined in the shared camel-cxf-common module, so the same non-prefixed names also applied to camel-cxfrs. No credentials are required when the bridging consumer is unauthenticated. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.14.8, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.3, from 4.19.0 before 4.21.0.

CVE-2026-46592
Messaging
Jul 6, 2026
High8.2Apache

High [CVE-2025-66169 +1] Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Data Query Logic vulnerability in Apache Camel Neo4J component

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Data Query Logic vulnerability in Apache Camel Neo4J component. The camel-neo4j producer builds the Cypher WHERE clause for its match/retrieve and delete operations from the CamelNeo4jMatchProperties map. CVE-2025-66169 addressed Cypher injection through the property values by binding them as query parameters ($paramN), but the property names (the JSON keys of that map) were still concatenated into the query string verbatim in Neo4jProducer.retrieveNodes() and deleteNode(). A property name containing Cypher syntax therefore alters the structure of the executed query. Where a route maps untrusted input into the CamelNeo4jMatchProperties map - for example by passing a request body as the match map, or from a consumer that does not filter inbound Camel* headers - an attacker who controls the JSON key names can inject arbitrary Cypher and read, modify or delete any node or relationship in the Neo4j database. The CamelNeo4jMatchProperties header is itself Camel-prefixed and is filtered by the HTTP header-filter strategy, so a plain HTTP client cannot set it directly; the issue is reachable through routes that deliberately or inadvertently carry untrusted data into that header. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.10.0 before 4.14.8, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.3, from 4.19.0 before 4.21.0.

CVE-2025-66169CVE-2026-46591
Messaging
Jul 6, 2026
High8.8Apache

High [CVE-2026-40048 +1] Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Apache Camel PQC component

Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Apache Camel PQC component. The camel-pqc component persists post-quantum key metadata (KeyMetadata) through pluggable KeyLifecycleManager implementations. HashicorpVaultKeyLifecycleManager and AwsSecretsManagerKeyLifecycleManager read that metadata back from the configured secret backend by deserializing a Base64-wrapped value with a raw java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject() and no ObjectInputFilter or class allow-list; the cast to KeyMetadata happens only after readObject() returns, so any readObject() side effects in a crafted object run before the type check. The same unfiltered legacy-migration read also remained in FileBasedKeyLifecycleManager (for the stored KeyPair and KeyMetadata). A principal who can write to the operator-controlled backend that holds these values - the HashiCorp Vault KV path, or the AWS Secrets Manager secret (requiring a Vault token or secretsmanager:PutSecretValue) - could store a crafted serialized object that is deserialized during normal key-lifecycle operations, potentially leading to code execution in the context of the application that manages the keys.

CVE-2026-40048CVE-2026-46590
Messaging
Jul 6, 2026