Skip to content

✓

Your privacy, your choice

VulniPulse uses Google Ads measurement to understand visits from advertisements and campaign performance. It runs cookie-free until you choose — accepting enables cookies for more accurate attribution. Rejecting keeps it cookie-free and never limits the site.

See exactly what is measured

AdvisoriesCiscoFortinetMS ServerVMwarePalo AltoVeeamJuniperLinuxCommvaultNetScalerIvantiArubaApacheSynologySonicWallMikroTikOmnissaUbiquitipfSenseProxmoxQNAPNetAppF5SophosCheck PointSplunkAtlassianDockerNETGEARWatchGuardZyxelGitLabAll vendors

VulniPulse Discord

Join the CVE community

Discuss active CVEs, compare patch notes and use vendor channels. Connect your account so Discord benefits can follow your plan.

See the Discord community Sign in to connect your plan

Joining the server and linking your VulniPulse account are separate, privacy-conscious steps.

VulniPulse

Official vendor advisories organised for defensive patching decisions. Always confirm remediation against the linked vendor source before acting.

Monitor

Multi-vendor CVE monitor
Device search
Threat insights

Explore

Latest advisories
How to monitor CVEs
Pricing
Suggestions
RSS feed

Trust

Methodology
Privacy
Terms
Delete account
Discord community

Medium 1 vendor · 1 advisory

CVE-2026-52925

Unified cross-vendor view: this CVE is referenced by 1 tracked vendor. Each vendor rates and fixes it independently — confirm the impact for your specific products below.

NVD detail CVE.org

Linux1 advisory

Medium5.5Fix a potential NPD when removing a port from a VRFJun 24, 2026

CVE-2026-52925 — medium severity, 1 vendor affected | VulniPulse