Skip to content
VulniPulse

Apache Software Foundation Security Advisories & CVEs

470 advisories tracked · ASF Security (security@apache.org CNA) via NVD · direct feeds checked every minute; rate-limited backstops use a safe source cadence

Android app · Google Play

Monitor Apache CVEs from your phone.

Choose a whole vendor or a precise platform, then receive matching security advisories by phone notification, email, or both. Coverage follows 32 official vendor sources and 160+ reviewed platform categories.

Check if your Apache device is affected

Pick your product and enter the exact software release it runs. We match it against the affected/fixed versions in Apache's recent advisories.

Official source

ASF Security (security@apache.org CNA) via NVD

The Apache Software Foundation is its own CVE Numbering Authority: every Apache project CVE (HTTP Server, Tomcat, ActiveMQ, Struts, Kafka, Airflow, OFBiz, Solr and 300+ more) is published by security@apache.org and announced on the projects' mailing lists. VulniPulse ingests the CNA feed from NVD filtered to security@apache.org — official, machine-readable, with affected/fixed versions embedded in each description. Per-project security pages (httpd.apache.org/security, tomcat.apache.org/security-XX.html) carry the vendor detail.

Latest Apache advisories

High8.8Apache

High [CVE-2026-58076 +2] Apache Airflow's Task SDK rebuilt a `Callback` object from serialized data by re-running its constructor, which imports the module named by the stored callback path

Apache Airflow's Task SDK rebuilt a `Callback` object from serialized data by re-running its constructor, which imports the module named by the stored callback path. Because `SyncCallback` is itself an Airflow class it passes the default `allowed_deserialization_classes` allow-list, so tightening that setting does not help. A Dag author — who controls a task instance's `next_kwargs` through the task execution API — can therefore cause an arbitrary module to be imported inside the scheduler process, when the scheduler's `awaiting_input` timeout sweep deserializes that value. No non-default configuration is required; the sweep runs unconditionally. Versions before 3.3.0 are not affected: the class existed, but the scheduler sweep that reaches it did not. This is a separate code path from CVE-2026-58076 and CVE-2026-67260, which cover different gadgets reaching deserialization — applying either of those fixes does not address this one. Users are advised to upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.1 or later.

CVE-2026-58076CVE-2026-67260CVE-2026-67587
Airflow
Aug 12, 2026
High7.5Apache

High [CVE-2026-68968] Apache Airflow's Backfill API authorized a request against a Dag id supplied by the caller whenever the `backfill_id` path segment failed to parse

Apache Airflow's Backfill API authorized a request against a Dag id supplied by the caller whenever the `backfill_id` path segment failed to parse. The authorization dependency parsed it with `int()` while the route handler parsed it as pydantic's `NonNegativeInt`, which accepts values `int()` rejects (`1.0` coerces to `1`); FastAPI resolves dependencies before endpoint validation, so the two acted on different Dags. An authenticated user holding edit permission on any single Dag could therefore read, pause and cancel backfills belonging to any other Dag, including moving another Dag's queued runs to `failed`. No non-default configuration is required and backfill ids are sequential, so finding a target is trivial. Users are advised to upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.1 or later, which parses the backfill id with the same type the routes declare.

CVE-2026-68968
Airflow
Aug 12, 2026
Medium6.1Apache

Medium [CVE-2026-73237] XSS vulnerability in Markdown handling in Apache Allura

XSS vulnerability in Markdown handling in Apache Allura. This issue affects Apache Allura: from 1.10.0 before 1.19.1. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.19.1, which fixes the issue.

CVE-2026-73237
Unclassified
Aug 12, 2026
Medium6.1Apache

Medium [CVE-2026-73238] XSS vulnerability in code display in Apache Allura

XSS vulnerability in code display in Apache Allura. This issue affects Apache Allura: before 1.19.1. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.19.1, which fixes the issue.

CVE-2026-73238
Unclassified
Aug 12, 2026
Medium6.5Apache

Medium [CVE-2026-73239] Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) due to missing permission checks for multiple Artifact types in Apache Allura

Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) due to missing permission checks for multiple Artifact types in Apache Allura. This issue affects Apache Allura: before 1.19.1. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.19.1, which fixes the issue.

CVE-2026-73239
Unclassified
Aug 12, 2026
Medium6.5Apache

Medium [CVE-2026-59244] Apache Airflow's secrets masker did not mask `var.json` Variable values whose value is a dict in the Rendered Templates UI — the dict value failed an `isinstance(str)` guard — so a secret stored as a JSON Variable and referenced in a template via `var.json` was displayed in cleartext to any user with access to that task's Rendered Templates view

Apache Airflow's secrets masker did not mask `var.json` Variable values whose value is a dict in the Rendered Templates UI — the dict value failed an `isinstance(str)` guard — so a secret stored as a JSON Variable and referenced in a template via `var.json` was displayed in cleartext to any user with access to that task's Rendered Templates view. Users are advised to upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.1 or later, which masks nested Variable values regardless of type.

CVE-2026-59244
Airflow
Aug 12, 2026
Medium5.4Apache

Medium [CVE-2026-59242] Apache Airflow's XCom `GET /api/v2/{...}/xcomEntries/{key}?deserialize=true` endpoint passed a string-literal payload through `BaseXCom.deserialize_value` without the `_check_forbidden_xcom_keys` guard, allowing an authenticated API user with XCom write-and-read access to instantiate arbitrary `airflow.*` classes on the API server (CWE-502)

Apache Airflow's XCom `GET /api/v2/{...}/xcomEntries/{key}?deserialize=true` endpoint passed a string-literal payload through `BaseXCom.deserialize_value` without the `_check_forbidden_xcom_keys` guard, allowing an authenticated API user with XCom write-and-read access to instantiate arbitrary `airflow.*` classes on the API server (CWE-502). An authenticated user who can write an XCom value and then read it back with `deserialize=true` triggers the unsafe instantiation. Users are advised to upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.1 or later, which rejects reserved XCom serialization keys submitted as JSON string literals.

CVE-2026-59242
Airflow
Aug 12, 2026
Medium4.3Apache

Medium [CVE-2026-42358 +1] Apache Airflow's secrets masker hides values stored under sensitive key names when they are displayed in the UI

Apache Airflow's secrets masker hides values stored under sensitive key names when they are displayed in the UI. The masker's recursion-depth limit did not descend into values nested inside a list, tuple, or set beyond that limit, so an Airflow Variable holding such a deeply-nested value was shown unmasked in the Variables UI. The exposure is limited to the UI: any authenticated user who can see the Variable in the UI can already read its full value through the Variables REST API, so this does not disclose data the user could not otherwise obtain — the masking is a shoulder-surfing defense for the UI, not an access-control boundary. This is an incomplete-fix follow-up to CVE-2026-42358, whose fix made only the dictionary walk unbounded; lists, tuples, and sets beyond the depth limit remained unmasked in the UI. Deployments that applied the CVE-2026-42358 fix should also upgrade to address this residual case. Upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.1 or later.

CVE-2026-42358CVE-2026-54183
Airflow
Aug 12, 2026
Medium6.5Apache

Medium [CVE-2026-48828 +2] Apache Airflow's Config API did not mask team-scoped sensitive configuration values in multi-team deployments

Apache Airflow's Config API did not mask team-scoped sensitive configuration values in multi-team deployments. When an administrator has enabled multi-team mode and exposed the Config API, an authenticated Viewer holding only configuration-read access — with no prior access to the secret — could read a team-scoped Celery broker URL, including its embedded credentials, in cleartext, while the equivalent global option was correctly masked. The secrets masker matched only base section and option names and did not normalize team-prefixed sections before the sensitivity check (CWE-200). This is a distinct masker bypass from CVE-2026-48828 and CVE-2026-48892: deployments that upgraded to apache-airflow 3.3.0 to address those issues remain affected by this team-scoped variant. Users are advised to upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.1 or later, which normalizes team-scoped sections before masking.

CVE-2026-48828CVE-2026-48892CVE-2026-65017
Airflow
Aug 12, 2026
Medium6.5Apache

Medium [CVE-2026-50204 +1] Apache Airflow wrote Variable values and Connection `extra` contents to the audit log in cleartext when they were submitted through the bulk endpoints (`PATCH /api/v2/variables` and `PATCH /api/v2/connections`)

Apache Airflow wrote Variable values and Connection `extra` contents to the audit log in cleartext when they were submitted through the bulk endpoints (`PATCH /api/v2/variables` and `PATCH /api/v2/connections`). The audit-log masking recognised only top-level request fields, and a bulk request nests its entities two levels below, so no masking was applied to them. Any authenticated user with audit-log read access -- who need not hold Variables or Connections read at all -- could recover those secrets verbatim, and the Connection `extra` copy is stored unencrypted in the log while the connection table encrypts it. The Airflow UI's *Import Variables* action posts to this endpoint, so an ordinary operator import wrote every secret in the file to the log. This is a different code path from CVE-2026-50204: that fix shipped in 3.3.0 and covers the single-entity endpoints only, so deployments that upgraded in response to that advisory remain affected and must upgrade again. Users are advised to upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.1 or later.

CVE-2026-50204CVE-2026-68969
Airflow
Aug 12, 2026
Medium6.5Apache

Medium [CVE-2026-59244 +1] Apache Airflow's Task SDK did not mask the contents of a Variable whose JSON value is a list, so secrets stored in that shape appeared in cleartext in task logs and in the Rendered Templates UI

Apache Airflow's Task SDK did not mask the contents of a Variable whose JSON value is a list, so secrets stored in that shape appeared in cleartext in task logs and in the Rendered Templates UI. Masking was applied only when the deserialized value was a string or a dict; a list at the top level matched neither and was returned unmasked. Any authenticated user able to read the logs or rendered templates of a task that references such a Variable could recover the values, with no special configuration required. This is the list-shaped counterpart of CVE-2026-59244, whose fix covered the dict case only, so deployments that upgraded in response to that advisory remain affected and must upgrade again. Users are advised to upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.1 or later.

CVE-2026-59244CVE-2026-68970
Airflow
Aug 12, 2026
Medium6.5Apache

Medium [CVE-2026-68971] Apache Airflow's asset materialization endpoint (`POST /api/v2/assets/{asset_id}/materialize`) and the XCom result check on `wait_dag_run_until_finished` authorized the target Dag without its team, unlike every other authorization site

Apache Airflow's asset materialization endpoint (`POST /api/v2/assets/{asset_id}/materialize`) and the XCom result check on `wait_dag_run_until_finished` authorized the target Dag without its team, unlike every other authorization site. A team-aware auth manager distinguishes a team-scoped Dag from a global one by that field -- the Keycloak auth manager, for example, checks the `DAG` resource instead of `DAG:` -- so the team-scoped permission that should gate the request was never consulted. In a deployment running multi-team mode with a team-aware auth manager, an authenticated user in one team could trigger Dag runs belonging to another team, supplying their own `dag_run_id` and `conf`, and could read another team's XCom values. Deployments using the FAB auth manager are unaffected, as it has no multi-team support. Users are advised to upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.1 or later, which resolves the Dag's team at both sites.

CVE-2026-68971
Airflow
Aug 12, 2026
Medium5.4Apache

Medium [CVE-2026-68076] Apache Airflow's environment-variable secrets backend resolved a team-scoped Connection or Variable from the wrong team's scope

Apache Airflow's environment-variable secrets backend resolved a team-scoped Connection or Variable from the wrong team's scope. The guard meant to prevent this only ran when no team scope was supplied, and its pattern could not match a team name containing an underscore, which team names are allowed to contain. When the guard did not apply, the lookup fell through to an unconditional global read that resolved the stored `AIRFLOW_CONN_____` variable regardless of which team asked. In multi-team mode an authenticated user of one team could therefore have `POST /api/v2/connections/test` resolve another team's Connection and authenticate outward with that team's credentials; the endpoint uses the credentials rather than returning them. Exploitation requires `[core] multi_team` enabled, `[core] test_connection` set to `Enabled` (it ships `Disabled`), team-scoped secrets provisioned as environment variables in the API-server process, and knowledge of the encoded identifier. Redirecting the test at an attacker-controlled host is separately blocked. Users are advised to upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.1 or later.

CVE-2026-68076
Airflow
Aug 12, 2026
Medium6.5Apache

Medium [CVE-2026-68868] The Google Cloud Secret Manager secrets backend in Apache Airflow's Google provider never applied the team scope when resolving Connections and Variables: the caller's `team_name` was accepted by the backend but dropped at the internal call boundary, so every lookup resolved against the team-agnostic secret name

The Google Cloud Secret Manager secrets backend in Apache Airflow's Google provider never applied the team scope when resolving Connections and Variables: the caller's `team_name` was accepted by the backend but dropped at the internal call boundary, so every lookup resolved against the team-agnostic secret name. In a deployment running multi-team mode with this backend, a task or Dag belonging to one team resolved another team's Connection or Variable, obtaining its credentials in full. No unusual configuration is required beyond enabling multi-team mode and using this backend. Users are advised to upgrade to apache-airflow-providers-google 22.3.0 or later, which builds and applies the team-scoped secret name.

CVE-2026-68868
Airflow
Aug 12, 2026
Critical9.1Apache

Critical [CVE-2026-71290] Improper TLS hostname verification vulnerability in Apache HttpComponents Client 5.4 or newer

Improper TLS hostname verification vulnerability in Apache HttpComponents Client 5.4 or newer. HostnameVerificationPolicy#BUILTIN setting has no effect when used with the async version of HttpClient. An attacker that can intercept and modify traffic between the client and the server can impersonate the server by presenting a valid certificate for a different domain. Please note the classic version of HttpClient is not affected by this vulnerability. Affected users are recommended to upgrade to at least version 5.6.4, which fixes the issue.

CVE-2026-71290
Unclassified
Aug 11, 2026
Critical9.1Apache

Critical [CVE-2026-69223] Apache Allura's webhooks are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Apache Allura's webhooks are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). This issue affects Apache Allura: before 1.19.1. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.19.1, which fixes the issue.

CVE-2026-69223
Unclassified
Aug 11, 2026
Critical9.8Apache

Critical [CVE-2026-28672] Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') vulnerability in Apache Ranger

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') vulnerability in Apache Ranger. This issue affects Apache Ranger: from 0.6 through 2.8.

CVE-2026-28672
Unclassified
Aug 10, 2026
Critical9.8Apache

Critical [CVE-2026-32227] SQL Injection vulnerability vulnerability in Apache Ranger

SQL Injection vulnerability vulnerability in Apache Ranger. This issue affects. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.9.0, which fixes the issue.

CVE-2026-32227
Unclassified
Aug 10, 2026
Critical9.8Apache

Critical [CVE-2026-40920] Privilege Escalation via URL Parameter is reported in Apache Ranger versions <= 2.8.0

Privilege Escalation via URL Parameter is reported in Apache Ranger versions <= 2.8.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.9.0, which fixes this issue.

CVE-2026-40920
Unclassified
Aug 10, 2026
Critical9.8Apache

Critical [CVE-2026-42537] Remote Code Execution via JDBC URL Injection in Apache Ranger <= 2.8.0 Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.9.0, which fixes this issue

Remote Code Execution via JDBC URL Injection in Apache Ranger <= 2.8.0 Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.9.0, which fixes this issue.

CVE-2026-42537
Unclassified
Aug 10, 2026

← All vendors