Skip to content
VulniPulse

Red Hat Linux Security Advisories & CVEs

13747 advisories tracked · Red Hat Security Data API · direct feeds checked every minute; rate-limited sources checked less often

Android app · Google Play

Monitor Red Hat CVEs from your phone.

Choose a whole vendor or a precise platform, then receive matching security advisories by phone notification, email, or both. Coverage follows 34 official vendor sources and 160+ reviewed platform categories.

Security advisories for your Red Hat release

Pick your distribution release to see every advisory issued for it and its severity mix. Fixes ship as errata, so keep the system patched. This is the release's advisory history, not a per-package scan.

Official source

Red Hat Security Data API

Red Hat Enterprise Linux errata (RHSA) via the official Red Hat Security Data API — CVE severity, CVSS and affected packages. A credential-free official source.

Latest Red Hat advisories

High7.5Red Hat

High [CVE-2026-68580] Remote code execution or denial of service via audio input integer overflow

FreeRDP before 3.29.0 contains integer overflow vulnerabilities in the audio input redirection channel (audin) across ALSA, sndio, WinMM, and OpenSL ES backends that fail to validate the FramesPerPacket parameter from RDP servers. Attackers can supply a malicious FramesPerPacket value causing allocation size wraparound, resulting in heap-based buffer overflow on ALSA or denial of service on all platforms. A flaw was found in FreeRDP, an open-source implementation of the Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP). This can lead to a heap-based buffer overflow, potentially enabling arbitrary code execution on systems using the ALSA backend, or a denial of service across all supported platforms. The vulnerability arises from an integer overflow in the audio input redirection channel (audin) when connecting to a malicious RDP server, which can cause a heap-based buffer overflow, particularly affecting Linux systems using the ALSA backend. Exploitation requires user interaction to connect to a compromised server. Red Hat severity: Important — CVSS 7.5 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). Weakness: CWE-190.

CVE-2026-68580
Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Aug 2, 2026
Medium6.5Red Hat

Medium [CVE-2026-18573] Client access-type policy condition bypass during client update

A flaw was found in the keycloak-services component of Keycloak, which is used for managing authentication and authorization flows. The issue occurs when a realm administrator configures client policies to enforce specific authentication requirements on confidential clients. Due to improper evaluation of the client state during an update operation, an attacker with client management permissions can bypass these security policies by first creating a public client and then updating it to a confidential client with weaker authentication. This can result in the persistence of clients that do not comply with the intended security hardening of the realm. The Red Hat Product Security team has assessed the severity of this vulnerability as Moderate, given that exploitation requires existing client management privileges or a dynamic registration token. Successful exploitation allows an attacker to bypass realm-specific client policy conditions and persist confidential clients with weaker authentication than required by policy. The vulnerability's root cause is the evaluation of update operations against the previous client state rather than the proposed new state. Weakness: CWE-862. Affected Red Hat products: Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6; Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.7.

CVE-2026-18573
Unclassified
Aug 2, 2026
Medium6.5Red Hat

Medium [CVE-2026-18572] UMA claim token can override authorization time-policy evaluation attributes

Keycloak provides authorization services that allow administrators to restrict access to resources based on time policies (for example, only allowing access during business hours). A flaw was discovered where a user can include a fake time value in their authorization request that overrides the actual server time. This allows the user to bypass these time-based restrictions and access protected resources at unauthorized times. The Red Hat Product Security team has assessed the severity of this vulnerability as Moderate, given that exploitation requires the attacker to be an authenticated user and the target resource must be specifically protected by a time-based authorization policy. Successful exploitation allows an attacker to bypass temporal access controls and obtain permissions outside of allowed time windows. The vulnerability's root cause is the improper merging of user-supplied claims which allows them to overwrite trusted server-side evaluation attributes. Weakness: CWE-863. Affected Red Hat products: Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6; Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.7. Red Hat lists Red Hat Data Grid 8; Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack; Red Hat Single Sign-On 7 as not affected. Red Hat fixing advisory: RHSA-2026:68277, RHSA-2026:68278.

CVE-2026-18572
Unclassified
Aug 2, 2026
Medium6.6Red Hat

Medium [CVE-2026-18571] FGAP V2 group assignment bypass during user creation

A flaw was found in the user creation component of Keycloak when Fine-Grained Admin Permissions V2 (FGAP V2) is enabled. This issue allows a sub-administrator with permission to create users to add those users to any group, even groups the sub-administrator is not authorized to manage. This could lead to unauthorized access to sensitive information or elevated privileges for the newly created users. The Red Hat Product Security team has assessed the severity of this vulnerability as Moderate, given that it requires the non-default Fine-Grained Admin Permissions V2 to be enabled and the attacker must already possess high-level sub-administrator privileges. Successful exploitation allows an attacker to bypass group membership restrictions during user creation, potentially leading to unauthorized privilege escalation for new users. The vulnerability's root cause is a missing authorization check for group assignments within the user creation API payload. Weakness: CWE-862. Affected Red Hat products: Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6; Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.7. Red Hat lists Red Hat Data Grid 8; Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack; Red Hat Single Sign-On 7 as not affected. Red Hat fixing advisory: RHSA-2026:68277, RHSA-2026:68278.

CVE-2026-18571
Unclassified
Aug 2, 2026
Medium5.4Red Hat

Medium [CVE-2026-18570] Full-scope-disabled client policy validation bypass via omitted fullScopeAllowed

A flaw was found in the full-scope-disabled client-policy executor within the keycloak-services component. This component is responsible for enforcing security policies during client registration and configuration in Red Hat Build of Keycloak. The issue occurs because the executor only validates the fullScopeAllowed field when it is explicitly provided in a request. By omitting this field, a delegated user can bypass the policy, resulting in a client created with full scope access. This allows the client to obtain tokens with unauthorized role mappings. The Red Hat Product Security team has assessed the severity of this vulnerability as Moderate, given that exploitation requires the attacker to have delegated client creation privileges and the realm must have a specific policy configuration. Successful exploitation allows an attacker to bypass client scope restrictions and obtain tokens with unauthorized permissions. The vulnerability's root cause is the failure of the policy executor to account for default server behavior when the fullScopeAllowed field is missing from a request. Weakness: CWE-862. Affected Red Hat products: Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6; Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.7. Red Hat lists Red Hat Data Grid 8; Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack; Red Hat Single Sign-On 7 as not affected.

CVE-2026-18570
Unclassified
Aug 2, 2026
High8.4Red Hat

High [CVE-2026-67323] Arbitrary code execution via command injection due to unguarded Git options

GitPython before 3.1.51 fails to guard against dangerous Git options passed as keyword arguments in Repo.archive() and git.ls_remote(), allowing command injection via options such as --exec/--upload-pack (leading to arbitrary command execution). Additionally, Repo.iter_commits() and Repo.blame() do not check for leading-dash revision arguments, so a revision like --output= can cause Git to open and truncate an arbitrary file. Exploitation requires an application that passes attacker-controlled arguments to these methods. This vulnerability allows an attacker to inject arbitrary commands when using functions like Repo.archive() and git.ls_remote(), potentially leading to arbitrary code execution. This is an Important vulnerability because it allows for arbitrary code execution or file truncation. This could lead to a compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability on affected Red Hat products that utilize GitPython in such a manner. Red Hat severity: Important — CVSS 8.4 (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). Weakness: CWE-88. Affected products named by the advisory: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8; Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9; Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9; Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.7; and 11 more.

CVE-2026-67323
Unclassified
Aug 1, 2026
High7.0Vendor: MediumRed Hat

High [CVE-2026-67326] Remote Code Execution via Newline Injection in config_writer

GitPython before 3.1.50 fails to validate newline characters in the section parameter of config_writer(), allowing attackers to inject arbitrary section headers into.git/config. Attackers can inject newlines to create a forged [core] section with hooksPath pointing to attacker-controlled directories, achieving remote code execution when git hooks are triggered. A flaw was found in GitPython. Red Hat severity: Moderate — CVSS 7 (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). Weakness: CWE-93. Affected Red Hat products: Red Hat Hardened Images. Red Hat fixing advisory: RHSA-2026:44416, RHSA-2026:45785, RHSA-2026:45940.

CVE-2026-67326
Unclassified
Aug 1, 2026
High7.5Red Hat

High [CVE-2026-67312] Denial of Service via uncontrolled recursion in form data processing

axios versions from 0.28.0 before 0.33.0 and from 1.0.0 before 1.18.0 contain uncontrolled recursion in formDataToJSON (exposed as axios.formToJSON() and used internally when serializing FormData with Content-Type: application/json). When an application passes attacker-controlled FormData field names, a field name with thousands of nested bracket-delimited segments causes unbounded recursion in buildPath(), exhausting the JavaScript call stack (RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded) and causing denial of service for that request, or process termination in applications without appropriate error handling. A flaw was found in axios, a popular JavaScript library. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by providing malicious form data containing deeply nested field names. This input triggers uncontrolled recursion within the formDataToJSON function, which is responsible for processing form data. This vulnerability affects applications that pass attacker-controlled FormData field names to axios' FormData-to-JSON conversion. Red Hat severity: Important — CVSS 7.5 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H). Weakness: CWE-674. Affected products named by the advisory: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.10; Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9; Red Hat Hardened Images; Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.30; and 4 more.

CVE-2026-67312
Unclassified
Aug 1, 2026
High7.5Red Hat

High [CVE-2026-67321] Denial of Service via object serialization bypass

axios versions 0.31.1 before 0.33.0 and 1.15.1 before 1.18.0 contain an incomplete depth-limit bypass in toFormData.js when serializing objects with top-level keys ending in '{}'. Attackers who control object keys and nested values passed to axios form or parameter serialization can trigger a RangeError from JSON.stringify, causing denial of service in the affected request path. A flaw was found in axios. A remote attacker could exploit an incomplete depth-limit bypass when the component serializes objects with specific top-level keys. Red Hat severity: Important — CVSS 7.5 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H). Weakness: CWE-770. Affected products named by the advisory: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13; Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14; Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.10; Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.11; and 20 more.

CVE-2026-67321
Unclassified
Aug 1, 2026
High8.8Red Hat

High [CVE-2026-67324] Arbitrary Code Execution via Joined Short Options Bypass

GitPython 3.1.50 fails to recognize joined short-option forms such as -u (the short form of --upload-pack=) when enforcing its default unsafe-option gate. When an application passes attacker-influenced clone options into Repo.clone_from(..., multi_options=..., allow_unsafe_options=False), an attacker can supply -u to bypass the gate that blocks --upload-pack/-u, causing Git to execute the specified helper command during clone. Fixed in 3.1.51. A flaw was found in GitPython. This allows the attacker to bypass security checks and execute arbitrary commands during a Git clone operation. This can lead to a complete compromise of the affected system. This vulnerability is rated as Important because exploitation requires an application to invoke `Repo.clone_from()` with attacker-controlled `multi_options` while `allow_unsafe_options=False` is set. This precondition means an attacker must already have some influence over a Git-related workflow within the consuming application, rather than exploiting it through mere network access. This affects GitPython version 3.1.50. Red Hat severity: Important — CVSS 8.8 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). Weakness: CWE-78.

CVE-2026-67324
Unclassified
Aug 1, 2026
High7.1Red Hat

High [CVE-2026-67298] Denial of Service via integer underflow in RAIL channel handling

Denial of Service via integer underflow in RAIL channel handling. Red Hat rates this important (CVSS 7.1). Weakness: CWE-191.

CVE-2026-67298
Unclassified
Aug 1, 2026
High7.4Red Hat

High [CVE-2026-67320] Information disclosure via Prototype Pollution in Node HTTP adapter

axios in a Node.js deployment using the HTTP adapter can route requests through an attacker-controlled proxy. axios hardens merged request configuration by creating a null-prototype object, but request interceptors run after the merge; a common immutable interceptor pattern such as {...config} or Object.assign({}, config) converts the hardened config back into a regular object. axios then dispatches that object without re-hardening it, and the Node HTTP adapter reads config.proxy through the prototype chain. For plaintext HTTP requests, the proxy can observe Authorization headers, Basic auth from config.auth, method, absolute URL, Host, and request body, and can return its own response. This does not establish browser impact or HTTPS header/body disclosure under normal TLS validation. Affected versions are >=0.31.1 (fixed in 0.33.0) and >=1.15.2 (fixed in 1.18.0). This vulnerability, known as Prototype Pollution, occurs because request interceptors can revert hardened request configurations, allowing an attacker to manipulate the Object.prototype.proxy property. If successfully exploited, an attacker can route affected plaintext HTTP requests through a malicious proxy, potentially observing sensitive data such as authentication headers and request bodies, and even returning their own responses.

CVE-2026-67320
Unclassified
Aug 1, 2026
High7.5Red Hat

High [CVE-2026-67322] Environment variable exfiltration via attacker-controlled clone URL

GitPython before 3.1.52 is vulnerable to environment-variable exfiltration in Repo.clone_from(). The caller-supplied remote URL is passed through Git.polish_url(), which on non-Cygwin platforms calls os.path.expandvars() on the URL before invoking git clone. An attacker who controls the clone URL can embed $NAME or ${NAME} tokens that are expanded to the values of the hosting process's environment variables (e.g., AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY or GITHUB_TOKEN). The resulting URL, now containing the secret, is transmitted over the network to an attacker-controlled host during the clone attempt, disclosing the secret. A flaw was found in GitPython. A remote attacker can exploit a vulnerability in the Repo.clone_from() method by providing a specially crafted Git repository URL. This allows the attacker to exfiltrate sensitive environment variables, such as access keys or tokens, to an attacker-controlled server during the cloning process, leading to information disclosure. This Important vulnerability in GitPython allows for sensitive environment variable exfiltration. This poses a risk of information disclosure, particularly for credentials or tokens, in Red Hat products that process untrusted clone URLs. Red Hat severity: Important — CVSS 7.5 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N). Weakness: CWE-214.

CVE-2026-67322
Unclassified
Aug 1, 2026
High8.8Red Hat

High [CVE-2026-67325] Command Injection via Git option prefix abbreviation

GitPython before 3.1.51 contains an incomplete command injection blocklist that fails to account for git's long-option prefix abbreviation feature. Attackers can bypass the unsafe options guard by using abbreviated option names like upload_p instead of upload_pack, which git resolves to dangerous options and executes arbitrary commands. A flaw was found in GitPython. This allows for the execution of arbitrary commands, leading to potential arbitrary code execution. This vulnerability is rated as Important as it allows for arbitrary command execution. It arises from an incomplete command injection blocklist in GitPython, which can be bypassed by supplying abbreviated Git options. This could lead to a complete compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability in Red Hat products that process untrusted input as keyword arguments to GitPython's Git commands. Red Hat severity: Important — CVSS 8.8 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). Weakness: CWE-78. Affected products named by the advisory: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8; Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9; Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9; Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.7; and 10 more.

CVE-2026-67325
Unclassified
Aug 1, 2026
High7.5Red Hat

High [CVE-2026-67313] Denial of Service via uncontrolled recursion in formDataToJSON

axios versions 0.28.0 and later contain uncontrolled recursion in formDataToJSON when processing FormData field names with deeply nested bracket segments. Attackers can supply FormData with field names containing thousands of nested brackets to exhaust the JavaScript call stack and trigger RangeError, causing request failure or process termination in applications that do not handle the exception. A flaw was found in axios. Red Hat severity: Important — CVSS 7.5 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H). Weakness: CWE-674. Affected products named by the advisory: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13; Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14; Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.1; Red Hat Hardened Images; and 22 more.

CVE-2026-67313
Unclassified
Aug 1, 2026
High7.4Red Hat

High [CVE-2026-67314] Outbound Request Tampering via Prototype Pollution in Basic Auth

axios versions >=1.15.2 and <1.18.0 contain prototype-pollution read-side gadgets in Basic auth subfield handling (lib/adapters/http.js and lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js). When an application is already affected by a separate prototype-pollution primitive and makes an axios request with an own auth object that omits the username and/or password properties, axios reads the inherited Object.prototype.username and Object.prototype.password values and uses them to construct an outbound 'Authorization: Basic...' header. axios itself does not pollute prototypes. The practical impact is outbound request tampering: an attacker who controls the polluted prototype values can inject attacker-chosen Basic auth credentials or replace an existing Authorization header. Credential disclosure is only possible under additional application-specific conditions. A flaw was found in axios. Red Hat severity: Important — CVSS 7.4 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). Weakness: CWE-915. Affected products named by the advisory: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13; Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.14; Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.1; Red Hat Hardened Images; and 19 more.

CVE-2026-67314
Unclassified
Aug 1, 2026
High7.5Red Hat

High [CVE-2026-67305] Remote Code Execution via Heap Buffer Overflow in Clipboard Processing

Remote Code Execution via Heap Buffer Overflow in Clipboard Processing. Red Hat rates this important (CVSS 7.5). Weakness: CWE-122.

CVE-2026-67305
Unclassified
Aug 1, 2026
High7.5Red Hat

High [CVE-2026-18536] Predictable random numbers due to unencrypted remote entropy sources

Data::Entropy versions before 0.010 for Perl read remote entropy sources over plain HTTP. The Data::Entropy::RawSource::RandomOrg integrity check trivially matches any non-empty byte string. Any on-path attacker, such as open WiFi, a compromised ISP, captive portal, or a hostile egress proxy substitutes the response and thereby chooses the bytes returned by rand_bits and rand_int for every application that selected one of these sources via with_entropy_source. The _checkbuf method response is equally attacker-controlled, so the retry/sleep behaviour is steerable too. This component reads remote entropy (randomness) sources over unencrypted HTTP. An on-path attacker, such as one on an open Wi-Fi network or a compromised internet service provider (ISP), can intercept and alter the responses from these sources. This allows the attacker to control the random bytes generated by the application, leading to predictable random numbers. Such a compromise of cryptographic randomness can have significant security implications, potentially enabling further attacks. This Important flaw in `perl-Data-Entropy` allows an on-path attacker to manipulate random number generation by intercepting unencrypted HTTP requests to specific remote entropy sources.

CVE-2026-18536
Unclassified
Aug 1, 2026
Medium4.3Red Hat

Medium [CVE-2026-67302] Denial of service in camera redirection due to divide-by-zero

FreeRDP before 3.29.0 (affected versions <= 3.28.0) contains a divide-by-zero vulnerability in the rdpecam camera redirection client. ecam_dev_process_start_streams_request() parses a server-controlled CAM_MEDIA_TYPE_DESCRIPTION from a StartStreamsRequest PDU but validates only Format and Flags, not FrameRateDenominator. When a malicious or compromised RDP server sends a StartStreamsRequest with FrameRateDenominator set to zero, ecam_encoder_context_init() (channels/rdpecam/client/encoding.c) computes FrameRateNumerator / FrameRateDenominator, causing an integer division by zero (SIGFPE) and termination of the FreeRDP client process. Camera redirection must be enabled on the client for the channel to be reachable. Fixed in FreeRDP 3.29.0. A flaw was found in FreeRDP, a remote desktop protocol client. A malicious or compromised RDP server can exploit this vulnerability by sending a specially crafted `StartStreamsRequest` with a zero value for `FrameRateDenominator`. This vulnerability in FreeRDP affects clients with camera redirection enabled. A malicious RDP server could send a crafted `StartStreamsRequest` PDU, leading to a divide-by-zero error and client process termination, resulting in a denial of service. Exploitation requires user interaction to connect to a compromised server with the vulnerable feature active.

CVE-2026-67302
Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Aug 1, 2026
Medium5.4Red Hat

Medium [CVE-2026-67306] Out-of-bounds read vulnerability via crafted RDP messages

FreeRDP versions 3.28.0 and earlier contain an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in the RDP6 planar RLE bitmap decoder functions planar_decompress_plane_rle and planar_decompress_plane_rle_only in libfreerdp/codec/planar.c. Only the 1-byte control byte is bounds-checked; the subsequent 0–15 attacker-declared raw bytes are read without validating that the source buffer contains them. A malicious or compromised RDP server can send a truncated planar-encoded bitmap or surface update (reachable via both the Bitmap Update PDU and RDPGFX Surface Command paths) that causes the client to read past the end of the source buffer. A flaw was found in FreeRDP. This can cause the client to read beyond the intended memory buffer, potentially leading to a denial of service (client crash) or the disclosure of sensitive information. Successful exploitation requires user interaction or specific client connection behavior. An attacker cannot trigger this vulnerability remotely on an arbitrary client system without the client actively initiating an RDP session to a malicious or compromised RDP server. The out-of-bounds read vulnerability is strictly contained within the client application process. Affected products named by the advisory: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8; and 2 more.

CVE-2026-67306
Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Aug 1, 2026

← All vendors

Free weekly CVE digest

Every Monday: the week's critical and high advisories for Red Hat or every vendor, new CISA KEV entries and upcoming end-of-life dates.

Free, no account. Confirm by email; unsubscribe in one click. Choose vendors and severity