Skip to content
VulniPulse
Medium6.5Apache Software Foundation

Medium [CVE-2026-34538] Apache Airflow versions 3.0.0 through 3.1.8 DagRun wait endpoint returns XCom result values even to users who only have DAG Run…

This medium-severity Apache Software Foundation advisory covers CVE-2026-34538 affecting Apache Airflow, Airflow.

CVE-2026-34538 Published Apr 9, 2026Updated by vendor Jun 17, 2026
Affected products & platforms
Apache Software FoundationAirflow
Open vendor advisory

Android app · Google Play

Monitor future Apache Software Foundation CVEs from your phone.

Choose a whole vendor or a precise platform, then receive matching security advisories by phone notification, email, or both. Coverage follows 32 official vendor sources and 160+ reviewed platform categories.

Matching phone alertsOptional email delivery

Summary

Apache Airflow versions 3.0.0 through 3.1.8 DagRun wait endpoint returns XCom result values even to users who only have DAG Run read permissions, such as the Viewer role. This behavior conflicts with the FAB RBAC model, which treats XCom as a separate protected resource, and with the security model documentation that defines the Viewer role as read-only.

Airflow uses the FAB Auth Manager to manage access control on a per-resource basis. The Viewer role is intended to be read-only by default, and the security model documentation defines Viewer users as those who can inspect DAGs without accessing sensitive execution results.

Users are recommended to upgrade to Apache Airflow 3.2.0 which resolves this issue.

Affected versions
  • through 3.1.8

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 2 months ago·verify at source

Fixed versions
  • 3.2.0

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 2 months ago·verify at source

Mitigation

Upgrade to a fixed release: 3.2.0. That is the remediation for this advisory.

The vendor advisory may list additional interim mitigations or workarounds not captured here — review it before change work.

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 2 months ago·verify at source

Discussion(0)

No comments yet. Share field notes, upgrade gotchas, or questions — verify against the vendor advisory before acting on community advice.

Sign in to join the discussion.