Advisory [CVE-2026-84747] Interpretation conflict in the HTTP protocol implementation in Apache bRPC (version < 1.18.0) on all platforms allows remote attackers to bypass access control rules enforced by a front proxy
This security Apache Software Foundation advisory covers CVE-2026-84747; related products: Apache bRPC.
Aggregated and source-linked by VulniPulse. Data sources, validation and limitations.
VulniPulse record published Record updated
Get an email when Apache Software Foundation publishes the next one.
VulniPulse checks Apache Software Foundation's security advisories around the clock and emails you new ones with the severity, the fixed version and the vendor's link. First month free, then US$15/month; we email you before the first charge.
Summary
Interpretation conflict in the HTTP protocol implementation in Apache bRPC (version < 1.18.0) on all platforms allows remote attackers to bypass access control rules enforced by a front proxy.
Root Cause: The method dispatch function FindMethodPropertyByURI() in bRPC's HTTP protocol splits the request path with a string splitter that skips empty fields, so paths containing empty path segments (consecutive slashes), such as //flags, /flags// and /flags//port, are dispatched to the same method as their collapsed form /flags.
Per RFC 3986 these are distinct paths. A front proxy that enforces an ACL (e.g. blocking access to builtin services such as /flags) matches the collapsed form only, and therefore forwards the padded literal to the bRPC server, where it is dispatched as if it were the collapsed form.
This differential allows //flags?setvalue= to reach a builtin service that /flags is not allowed to reach. Additionally, the HTTP/2 implementation never validated the:path pseudo-header, so requests without a:path, or with a:path that neither begins with '/' nor is the asterisk-form '*', contrary to RFC 9113 section 8.3.1, were not rejected.
Affected Scenarios: Deployments of Apache bRPC behind a front proxy or gateway that performs access control (ACL) decisions on the literal request path, where the bRPC server accepts HTTP or HTTP/2 traffic from that proxy.
- Apache bRPC before 1.18.0
Official advisory · medium-confidence parse· fetched 7 days ago·verify at source
- 1.18.0
Official advisory · medium-confidence parse· fetched 7 days ago·verify at source
Mitigation checklist
- Upgrade bRPC to version 1.18.0, which fixes this issue.
- Apply this patch: https://github.com/apache/brpc/pull/3512 Note: After applying the fix, HTTP and HTTP/2 request paths containing empty path segments (consecutive slashes) are rejected by default, and HTTP/2:path values that are empty or neither begin with '/' nor equal '*' are rejected.
- In such deployments an attacker can send a path containing empty path segments to reach a resource that the front proxy intended to block.
Official advisory · medium-confidence parse· fetched 7 days ago·verify at source
More Apache Software Foundation advisories
- CVE-2026-90484Oct 21, 2026The MySQL client response parser in Apache bRPC dereferences a null pointer
- CVE-2026-87849Oct 21, 2026The Discovery naming-service reply parser in Apache bRPC (versions < 1.18.0) calls
- CVE-2026-86249Oct 21, 2026On a brpc::Server that sets both ServerOptions.auth and ServerOptions.internal_port
- CVE-2026-86147Oct 21, 2026External control of file name or path and uncontrolled resource consumption in Apache bRPC
- CVE-2026-86146Oct 21, 2026Inconsistent interpretation of HTTP requests (HTTP request/response smuggling)
- CVE-2026-84748Oct 21, 2026Improper authorization in Apache bRPC (versions < 1.18.0) on all platforms allows remote
Android app · Google Play
Monitor future Apache Software Foundation CVEs from your phone.
Choose a whole vendor or a precise platform, then receive matching security advisories by phone notification, email, or both. Coverage follows 34 official vendor sources and 160+ reviewed platform categories.
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Share field notes, upgrade gotchas, or questions — verify against the vendor advisory before acting on community advice.
Sign in to join the discussion.