Skip to content
VulniPulse
Advisory severityHigh7.5Apache Software Foundation

High [CVE-2026-95616] integer overflow in WSS4J's DER bounds check lets an oversized allocation pass validation

This high-severity Apache Software Foundation advisory covers CVE-2026-95616; related products: Apache WSS4J.

Aggregated and source-linked by VulniPulse. Data sources, validation and limitations.

CVE-2026-95616 Source published Source updated

VulniPulse record published Record updated

Related products & platforms
Apache Software FoundationUnclassified
Open source advisory

Android app · Google Play

Monitor future Apache Software Foundation CVEs from your phone.

Choose a whole vendor or a precise platform, then receive matching security advisories by phone notification, email, or both. Coverage follows 32 official vendor sources and 160+ reviewed platform categories.

Matching phone alertsOptional email delivery

Summary

An integer overflow in WSS4J's DER bounds check lets an oversized allocation pass validation.

An unauthenticated attacker can send a SOAP message carrying an X.509 certificate whose SubjectKeyIdentifier extension declares a length of 0x7FFFFFFF; WSS4J decodes this while resolving the signature's key reference, before the message is authenticated, so an eleven-byte extension triggers a 2 GB allocation. Repeated requests exhaust server memory.

Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.0.2 or 3.0.6 or 2.4.4, which fix this issue.

Affected product named by the advisory: Apache WSS4J.

Affected versions
  • Apache WSS4J 4.0.0 before 4.0.2
  • Apache WSS4J 3.0.0 before 3.0.6
  • Apache WSS4J before 2.4.4

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 6 days ago·verify at source

Fixed versions
  • 4.0.2
  • 3.0.6
  • 2.4.4

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 6 days ago·verify at source

Mitigation checklist

Recommended fix / mitigation
  • Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.0.2 or 3.0.6 or 2.4.4, which fix this issue.

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 6 days ago·verify at source

Discussion(0)

No comments yet. Share field notes, upgrade gotchas, or questions — verify against the vendor advisory before acting on community advice.

Sign in to join the discussion.