Skip to content
VulniPulse
Advisory severityHigh7.5Vendor: LowRed Hat Linux

High [CVE-2026-14457] RPK server signature algorithm selection can dereference a missing certificate

This high-severity Red Hat Linux advisory covers CVE-2026-14457 affecting Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9, Cert Manager support for Red Hat OpenShift release 1.20.

Aggregated and source-linked by VulniPulse. Data sources, validation and limitations.

CVE-2026-14457 Source published Source updated

VulniPulse record published Record updated

Affected products & platforms
Red Hat LinuxRed Hat Enterprise Linux
Open source advisory

Android app · Google Play

Monitor future Red Hat Linux CVEs from your phone.

Choose a whole vendor or a precise platform, then receive matching security advisories by phone notification, email, or both. Coverage follows 34 official vendor sources and 160+ reviewed platform categories.

Matching phone alertsOptional email delivery

Summary

Issue summary: In a server or client configuration with RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) enabled, and only the private key (with no associated certificate) configured locally, a NULL pointer dereference may occur when the remote peer solicits raw public keys and also sends the typically omitted "signature_algorithms_cert" TLS extension.

Impact summary: The impact is limited to a possible Denial of Service as a result of an application abort, no data disclosure or remote command execution are possible.

CWE: CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference Description: While a passing comment in sample code in the documentation suggests that key-only RPK configurations are supported, the best-practice RPK configuration is to always configure a corresponding certificate (possibly self-signed or signed by any convenient CA).

When the private key is configured along with a matching certificate, the "signature_algorithms_cert" extension is handled reliably even without the fix, and peer clients or servers that don't support raw public keys may be able to complete a TLS connection by pinning or verifying the corresponding certificate or its public key.

Deployments that prefer to configure just a private key with no certificate need to upgrade to an updated release as noted below.

Affected versions

No affected-version range was extracted from the source record. The vendor advisory is authoritative — check it before change work.

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 8 days ago·verify at source

Fixed versions
  • openssl-1:3.5.8-1.el10_2
  • openssl-1:3.5.8-1.el9_8
  • cert-manager/jetstack-cert-manager-rhel9:1790223279
  • cert-manager/cert-manager-istio-csr-rhel9:1790223719
  • cert-manager/cert-manager-operator-rhel9:1790272426
  • cert-manager/jetstack-cert-manager-acmesolver-rhel9:1790589998
  • cert-manager/jetstack-cert-manager-rhel9:1790589912
  • cert-manager/cert-manager-istio-csr-rhel9:1790589914
  • cert-manager/cert-manager-operator-rhel9:1790589855
  • openssl3-main-3.5.8-0.1.hum1
  • openssl-main-3.5.8-0.1.hum1
  • rhui5/cds-kubernetes-rhel9:1789479916
  • rhui5/installer-rhel9:1789482961
  • rhui5/cds-rhel9:1790241954
  • rhui5/haproxy-rhel9:1790241900
  • rhui5/rhua-rhel9:1790242004
  • RHSA-2026:67154
  • RHSA-2026:67165
  • RHSA-2026:72394
  • RHSA-2026:72395
  • RHSA-2026:72399
  • RHSA-2026:72470
  • RHSA-2026:72475
  • RHSA-2026:72476
  • RHSA-2026:59635
  • RHSA-2026:59641
  • RHSA-2026:67956
  • RHSA-2026:71603

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 8 days ago·verify at source

Mitigation checklist

Recommended fix / mitigation
  • Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 8 days ago·verify at source

Discussion(0)

No comments yet. Share field notes, upgrade gotchas, or questions — verify against the vendor advisory before acting on community advice.

Sign in to join the discussion.