Skip to content
VulniPulse
Advisory severityHigh7.4Red Hat Linux

High [CVE-2026-59650] Bouncy Castle for Java: Cryptographic key compromise due to unvalidated Diffie-Hellman peer value

This high-severity Red Hat Linux advisory covers CVE-2026-59650.

Aggregated and source-linked by VulniPulse. Data sources, validation and limitations.

CVE-2026-59650 Source published Source updated

VulniPulse record published Record updated

Affected products & platforms
Red Hat LinuxUnclassified
Open source advisory

Android app · Google Play

Monitor future Red Hat Linux CVEs from your phone.

Choose a whole vendor or a precise platform, then receive matching security advisories by phone notification, email, or both. Coverage follows 34 official vendor sources and 160+ reviewed platform categories.

Matching phone alertsOptional email delivery

Summary

In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, MTI/A0 DH agreement exponentiates unvalidated peer value. The software fails to validate Diffie-Hellman peer values during key agreement.

A remote attacker can exploit this flaw to compromise cryptographic keys, potentially leading to the decryption of sensitive communications or successful impersonation. Red Hat severity: Important — CVSS 7.4 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N).

Weakness: CWE-325. Red Hat lists Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9; Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7; Red Hat Single Sign-On 7 as not affected.

Affected versions
  • < 1.85
  • < 2.73.12

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 23 days ago·verify at source

Fixed versions

No fixed release is recorded yet. That does not prove no patch exists — confirm against the vendor advisory.

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 23 days ago·verify at source

Mitigation

The source record does not include mitigation steps. That is not a statement that no fix exists — read the vendor advisory below for the authoritative guidance.

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 23 days ago·verify at source

Discussion(0)

No comments yet. Share field notes, upgrade gotchas, or questions — verify against the vendor advisory before acting on community advice.

Sign in to join the discussion.