Low [CVE-2026-61859] Information disclosure via policy bypass in -script operation
This low-severity Red Hat Linux advisory covers CVE-2026-61859 affecting Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7, Red Hat package: imagemagick.
Android app · Google Play
Monitor future Red Hat Linux CVEs from your phone.
Choose a whole vendor or a precise platform, then receive matching security advisories by phone notification, email, or both. Coverage follows 32 official vendor sources and 160+ reviewed platform categories.
Summary
ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 and 6.9.13-x before 6.9.13-51 contains a policy bypass vulnerability in the -script operation due to missing security policy checks. This allows reading files from paths that are otherwise disallowed by the configured security policy.
A flaw was found in ImageMagick. Red Hat Enterprise Linux ships ImageMagick in RHEL 6 ELS and RHEL 7 ELS.
This flaw has been rated as having a Low security impact and is not currently planned to be addressed in future updates of those products. For additional information, refer to the Issue Severity Classification:.
Red Hat severity: Low — CVSS 3.3 (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N). Weakness: CWE-639.
Affected Red Hat products: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7. Red Hat does not currently list a fixing RHSA for this CVE.
Affected products named by the advisory: Red Hat package: imagemagick.
- < 7.1.2-26
- < 6.9.13-x
- < 6.9.13-51
- 6.9.13
Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 5 days ago·verify at source
Fixed versions
No fixed release is recorded yet. That does not prove no patch exists — confirm against the vendor advisory.
Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 5 days ago·verify at source
Mitigation checklist
- Restrict use of the -script option by ensuring untrusted users cannot invoke ImageMagick commands directly. If ImageMagick is used in an automated pipeline, use a wrapper that does not pass the -script flag. Upgrade to ImageMagick 7.1.2-26 or 6.9.13-51 mitigates the issue.
Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 5 days ago·verify at source
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Share field notes, upgrade gotchas, or questions — verify against the vendor advisory before acting on community advice.
Sign in to join the discussion.