High [CVE-2026-70461] Information disclosure and denial of service via crafted files-from entry
This high-severity Red Hat Linux advisory covers CVE-2026-70461 affecting Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.
Android app · Google Play
Monitor future Red Hat Linux CVEs from your phone.
Choose a whole vendor or a precise platform, then receive matching security advisories by phone notification, email, or both. Coverage follows 32 official vendor sources and 160+ reviewed platform categories.
Summary
rsync 3.2.5 before 3.5.0 contains a heap out-of-bounds write vulnerability that allows remote unauthenticated attackers to write one attacker-controlled byte past the end of a heap allocation by supplying a crafted files-from entry.
Attackers can trigger the vulnerability against a read-only rsync daemon module by providing a files-from entry containing both an interior and trailing backslash, causing the add_implied_include() function to under-count the trailing backslash when sizing the destination buffer. A flaw was found in rsync.
This can lead to information disclosure or denial of service. This can be exploited against read-only rsync daemon modules, making it a significant risk for publicly exposed rsync services.
Red Hat severity: Important — CVSS 8.2 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H). Weakness: CWE-787.
Affected Red Hat products: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9; Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4. Red Hat lists Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 as not affected.
Red Hat does not currently list a fixing RHSA for this CVE.
Affected products named by the advisory: Red Hat package: rsync.
- < 3.2.5
- < 3.5.0
Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 1 hour ago·verify at source
Mitigation checklist
- Restrict access to the rsync daemon (TCP 873) to trusted hosts with firewall rules. If the daemon is unused, disable and stop rsyncd.service.
Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 1 hour ago·verify at source
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Share field notes, upgrade gotchas, or questions — verify against the vendor advisory before acting on community advice.
Sign in to join the discussion.