Skip to content
VulniPulse
High 2 vendors · 2 advisories

CVE-2026-79986: Apache Camel: camel-azure-files resolved the remote path of a polled file from the name reported in the server directory listing without constraining it to the directory being polled, so a listing entry containing traversal segments could be moved outside

CVE-2026-79986 key facts

CISA KEV
Not listed (catalogue checked )
Highest advisory rating
High
CVSS base score
7.4 (Apache), 7.4 (Red Hat)
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N · base score 7.4, scored by apacheAttack vector: network. Attack complexity: high. Privileges required: none. User interaction: none. Scope: unchanged. Confidentiality impact: high. Integrity impact: high. Availability impact: none.
Weakness
  • CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
EPSS
1.02% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (63rd percentile). FIRST EPSS, .
CISA SSVC
Exploitation: proof of concept exists. Automatable: no. Technical impact: total. CISA, .
Fixed releases
  • Apache: 4.18.5, 4.22.1
  • Red Hat: 4.23.0, 4.22, 4.22.1, 4.18, 4.18.5
Vendor advisories
2 from Apache, Red Hat
Assigned by
apache (CNA)
CVE record published
Listed by VulniPulse
Record changed

Ratings, versions and fixes are quoted from the vendor advisories that cover only CVE-2026-79986; each belongs to its advisory, not to every product listed. How records are collected and checked.

Description

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in Apache Camel Azure Files component. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.1. The Camel remote-file consumers poll a directory on a remote server and build the absolute remote path of each file by concatenating the configured directory with the file name reported in the server's directory listing. That concatenation (FtpUtils.absoluteFilePath and GenericFileConsumer) applied no lexical normalization and no check that the result stayed inside the directory being polled, and the resulting path became the operand for every subsequent remote operation on the file: retrieval (FtpOperations.retrieveFile / SftpOperations, reached from GenericFileConsumer where the retrieve name is taken verbatim from GenericFile.getAbsoluteFilePath), deletion when delete=true (GenericFileDeleteProcessStrategy), and renaming when move, preMove, moveFailed or readLock=rename is configured (GenericFileProcessStrategySupport and GenericFileRenameExclusiveReadLockStrategy). Neither isValidFile nor isMatched performed any containment check. A listing entry that is not a single path segment therefore resolved to a path outside the configured polling directory, causing Camel to read, delete or rename files outside it using the endpoint's own credentials. A listing name is not route-controlled data. It is supplied by the remote server, and the FTP control channel carries no integrity protection at all, so an on-path attacker can rewrite a LIST response without holding any credentials; a compromised, malicious or multi-tenant server, or a server backed by a virtual filesystem, can emit such a name directly. Retrieval is reachable in a default consumer configuration, since the remote consumers download every listed file; deletion and renaming additionally require one of the disposition options above, all of which are common. Escape from the directory Camel was configured to poll is unconditional, while escape from the server's own account boundary additionally depends on whether that server confines the account. The jailStartingDirectory option, which is documented as restricting Camel to the starting directory and is enabled by default, governed producer writes and, since the localWorkDirectory containment work, consumer downloads to the local work directory - but it did not constrain this remote operand, so its name and description claimed a boundary that was not enforced here. The same entry point had already been recognised on the local side: the localWorkDirectory download path was constrained so that a remote file name containing parent-directory segments could not resolve outside the local work directory. The remote operand was the remaining half of that surface. This artifact provides the azure-files scheme. Its consumer derives from the same RemoteFileConsumer base class and composed the remote path through a plain concatenation helper, so it inherited the same unconstrained resolution. Reaching it requires a listing name that is not a single path segment, which the Azure Files REST service does not normally return; the exposure was corrected on the same basis as the other remote-file consumers rather than from a demonstrated proof of concept against this scheme. Upgrade to Apache Camel 4.23.0, which fixes the issue. Users on the 4.22.x releases stream should upgrade to 4.22.1. Users on the 4.18.x LTS releases stream should upgrade to 4.18.5. The 4.14.x stream reached end of life and does not receive this fix; users on it should move to a supported releases stream.

Text from the CVE.org record (apache).

How do I fix CVE-2026-79986?

Upgrade to a fixed release named by the vendor:

  • Apache: 4.18.5, 4.22.1
  • Red Hat: 4.23.0, 4.22, 4.22.1, 4.18, 4.18.5
  • Upgrade to Apache Camel 4.23.0, which fixes the issue. (Apache)
  • Users on the 4.22.x releases stream should upgrade to 4.22.1. (Apache)
  • Upgrade to Apache Camel 4.23.0, which fixes the issue. Users on the 4.22.x releases stream should upgrade to 4.22.1. Users on the 4.18.x LTS releases stream should upgrade to 4.18.5. The 4.14.x stream reached end of life and does not receive this fix; users on it should move to a supported releases stream. The fix adds a separator-aware GenericFileHelper.isWithinDirectory overload, since remote paths always use a forward slash regardless of the platform Camel runs on, and a GenericFileConsumer.isWithinStartingDirectory strategy consulted from isValidFile when jailStartingDirectory is enabled. The base implementation is a no-op, because names obtained from a local directory listing are always single path segments; RemoteFileConsumer and SmbConsumer override it to compact the resolved path and verify on path-segment boundaries that it still resolves inside the directory being polled. A file resolving outside is skipped and a warning is logged, rather than raising, so that the remaining legitimate entries in the same listing still process. Containment was chosen over stripping the path component because remote directories are legitimately nested and a parent-directory segment that still resolves back inside the polled directory remains valid. The check runs after the existing match filters so that the "." and ".." entries returned by SFTP servers, which the hidden-file rule already excludes, do not log on every poll. The change adds no new module dependency. (CVE.org record)
  • Workaround: For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, scope the SAS token or account key used by the endpoint to the directory being polled, so that the service enforces the boundary independently of Camel. The HTTPS transport already protects the listing in transit, so the remaining exposure is a share whose contents are written by a party that is not trusted. Constrain the consumer with the filter, antInclude or include options so that only simple single-segment file names are accepted, and avoid enabling delete=true, move, preMove, moveFailed or readLock=rename on endpoints pointing at a server whose listing content is not fully trusted, since those options are what turn the issue from a read into a destructive operation. Where the server supports it, confine the account used by the endpoint to the polled directory, so that the server itself enforces the boundary independently of Camel. As defence in depth, treat file names reported by any remote server outside the route's trust boundary as untrusted input. (CVE.org record)

Vendor advisories for CVE-2026-79986

Apache

1 advisory
  • Advisory severityHigh7.4

    High [CVE-2026-79986] Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in Apache Camel Azure Files component

    CVE-2026-79986Source published Source updated

    Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in Apache Camel Azure Files component. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.1. The Camel remote-file consumers poll a directory on a remote server and build the absolute remote path of each file by concatenating the configured directory with the file name reported in the server's directory listing. That concatenation (FtpUtils.absoluteFilePath and GenericFileConsumer) applied no lexical normalization and no check that the result stayed inside the directory being polled, and the resulting path became the operand for every subsequent remote operation on the file: retrieval (FtpOperations.retrieveFile / SftpOperations, reached from GenericFileConsumer…

    Affected products in this advisory
    • Apache Camel Azure
    Source-reported affected versions
    • 4.0.0 before 4.18.5
    • 4.19.0 before 4.22.1
    Source-reported fixed versions
    • 4.18.5
    • 4.22.1
    Mitigation guidance
    • Upgrade to Apache Camel 4.23.0, which fixes the issue.
    • Users on the 4.22.x releases stream should upgrade to 4.22.1.
    • Users on the 4.18.x LTS releases stream should upgrade to 4.18.5.

Red Hat

1 advisory
  • Advisory severityHigh7.4

    High [CVE-2026-79986] Arbitrary file access and modification via path traversal

    CVE-2026-79986Source published Source updated

    Arbitrary file access and modification via path traversal. Red Hat rates this important (CVSS 7.4). Weakness: CWE-22.

    Related products — impact not confirmed
    No product details extracted. Check the source bulletin.
    Source-reported affected versions
    • < 4.0.0
    • < 4.18.5
    • < 4.19.0
    • < 4.22.1
    Source-reported fixed versions
    • 4.23.0
    • 4.22
    • 4.22.1
    • 4.18

    1 more entries in the full advisory.

    Mitigation guidance
    No mitigation guidance extracted; consult the source.

References

Timeline

  1. CVE record published
  2. First vendor advisory listed by VulniPulse
  3. CVE record last updated

All Apache advisories

Get an email when Apache publishes the next one.

See Apache's last 90 days of advisories first. Then choose one product with live alerts free for life, or a free month of real-time alerts on everything with the severity, the fixed version and the vendor's link (card needed, then US$15/month; we email you before the first charge).

Alert me about Apache

iPhone and Android apps · New on the App Store

Get alerts for new CVEs on your phone.

Choose a whole vendor or a precise platform, then receive matching security advisories by phone notification, email, or both. Coverage follows 34 official vendor sources and 160+ reviewed platform categories.

Matching phone alertsOptional email delivery