Skip to content
VulniPulse

Red Hat Linux Security Advisories & CVEs

13668 advisories tracked · Red Hat Security Data API · direct feeds checked every minute; rate-limited backstops use a safe source cadence

Android app · Google Play

Monitor Red Hat CVEs from your phone.

Choose a whole vendor or a precise platform, then receive matching security advisories by phone notification, email, or both. Coverage follows 34 official vendor sources and 160+ reviewed platform categories.

Security advisories for your Red Hat release

Pick your distribution release to see every advisory issued for it and its severity mix. Fixes ship as errata — keep the system patched. This is the release's advisory history, not a per-package scan.

Official source

Red Hat Security Data API

Red Hat Enterprise Linux errata (RHSA) via the official Red Hat Security Data API — CVE severity, CVSS and affected packages. A credential-free official source.

Latest Red Hat advisories

High8.6Red Hat

High [CVE-2026-69192] Inconsistent IP address parsing leads to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) and trust-boundary bypass

Inconsistent IP address parsing leads to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) and trust-boundary bypass. Red Hat rates this important (CVSS 8.6). Weakness: CWE-1389. Red Hat lists fixing advisory RHSA-2026:56338 with package nodejs24-1:24.18.0-5.el10_2, grafana13-1-main-13.1.1-0.5.2.hum1, ansible-automation-platform/automation-portal:1787047114, grafana13-1-main-13.1.2-0.1.hum1. Affected product named by the advisory: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.

CVE-2026-69192
Unclassified
Aug 4, 2026
High7.5Red Hat

High [CVE-2026-69185] Denial of Service via memory exhaustion from crafted packets

Denial of Service via memory exhaustion from crafted packets. Red Hat rates this important (CVSS 7.5). Weakness: CWE-770. Affected product named by the advisory: Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3.

CVE-2026-69185
Unclassified
Aug 4, 2026
High7.5Red Hat

High [CVE-2026-14257 +1] DoS via unbounded intermediate arrays, bypassing the CVE-2026-14257 mitigation

The brace-expansion library generates arbitrary strings containing a common prefix and suffix. Prior to 1.1.18, 2.1.4, 3.0.6, and 5.0.9, expand() does not apply maxLength while constructing comma-alternative intermediate arrays or padded sequences, allowing attacker-controlled input to exhaust memory or block the event loop. The fix for CVE-2026-14257 is bypassed by the vulnerability. This issue is fixed in versions 1.1.18, 2.1.4, 3.0.6, and 5.0.9. This issue is due to an incomplete mitigation of CVE-2026-14257. Any applications that pass user-controlled input to the `expand()` function are vulnerable to this issue. This flaw can result in an excessive consumption of memory that eventually terminates the process or blocks the event loop, both causing a denial of service. As this vulnerability allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service, it has been rated with an important severity. Red Hat severity: Important — CVSS 7.5 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H). Weakness: CWE-770. Affected products named by the advisory: Cryostat 4 on RHEL 9; Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8; Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.0 Extended Update Support; and 44 more.

CVE-2026-14257CVE-2026-69152
Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Aug 4, 2026
High8.1Red Hat

High [CVE-2026-69151] @angular/compiler: @angular/core: Angular: Cross-Site Scripting via internationalization event handlers

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 20.3.27, 21.2.19, and 22.0.1, the Angular compiler i18n pipeline permits i18n-onerror and other i18n-on event-handler attributes, allowing a lower-trust translation file to replace a static handler with executable JavaScript. This issue is fixed in versions 20.3.27, 21.2.19, and 22.0.1. A remote attacker could exploit this by injecting malicious scripts, leading to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). This could result in unauthorized access to sensitive information or actions performed on behalf of the user. Red Hat severity: Important — CVSS 8.1 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). Weakness: CWE-79. Affected Red Hat products: Red Hat Ceph Storage 4; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9. Red Hat lists Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2; Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 3; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 as not affected. Red Hat does not currently list a fixing RHSA for this CVE. Affected products named by the advisory: Red Hat package: ceph; Red Hat package: intel-cmt-cat.

CVE-2026-69151
Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Aug 4, 2026
High8.2Red Hat

High [CVE-2026-68945] @angular/common: Angular: Cross-Request Response Reuse and State Poisoning in HttpTransferCache

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 20.3.27, 21.2.19, and 22.0.2, HttpTransferCache comma-joins repeated request parameters, allowing semantically distinct HttpClient requests to use the same transfer-cache key and reuse a wrong backend response. This issue is fixed in versions 20.3.27, 21.2.19, and 22.0.2. A flaw was found in Angular's HttpTransferCache component. This component, used for caching HTTP requests during server-side rendering, incorrectly generates cache keys when repeated request parameters are present, causing semantically different requests to share the same cache key. This cache-key ambiguity can lead to cross-request response reuse and state poisoning, where a security-sensitive request might receive an incorrect or attacker-influenced cached response. This could result in an application displaying wrong information or operating with corrupted data, potentially leading to information disclosure. Red Hat severity: Important — CVSS 8.2 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N). Weakness: CWE-694. Affected Red Hat products: Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 3; Red Hat Ceph Storage 4; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9; Red Hat Fuse 7.

CVE-2026-68945
Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Aug 4, 2026
High7.5Red Hat

High [CVE-2026-12852] Bouncy Castle for Java: Denial of Service via MLS wire decoder

In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, MLS wire decoder allocates attacker-declared opaque length before bounds check. A remote attacker could exploit this by providing a specially crafted message to the MLS wire decoder. This can lead to excessive memory allocation, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS) for the application. This vulnerability targets the Messaging Layer Security (MLS) module, which in Bouncy Castle is packaged as bcmls. No Red Hat products are affected. Red Hat severity: Important — CVSS 7.5 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H). Weakness: CWE-1284. Red Hat lists Cryostat 4; OpenShift Developer Tools and Services; Red Hat AMQ Broker 7; Red Hat AMQ Clients; Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2; Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; Red Hat build of Apache Camel for Spring Boot 4; Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 3; Red Hat Build of Keycloak; Red Hat build of Quarkus; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9; Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7; Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8; Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack; Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4; Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces; Red Hat Satellite 6; Red Hat Single Sign-On 7 as not affected.

CVE-2026-12852
Unclassified
Aug 3, 2026
High7.4Red Hat

High [CVE-2026-58062] Bouncy Castle for Java: Certificate validation bypass via stapled OCSP response

In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, Stapled OCSP response accepted without binding to the checked certificate. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12, and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bc-fips 2.0.2 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.3 (2.1.X series). A remote attacker could exploit this by presenting a stapled Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) response that is not properly bound to the certificate being checked. This vulnerability allows for a certificate validation bypass, potentially leading to applications accepting invalid or revoked certificates. This could enable man-in-the-middle attacks or unauthorized access. Important: This vulnerability in Bouncy Castle for Java allows a remote attacker to bypass certificate validation. Red Hat severity: Important — CVSS 7.4 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). Weakness: CWE-295. Affected Red Hat products: OpenShift Developer Tools and Services; Red Hat AMQ Broker 7; Red Hat build of Apache Camel for Spring Boot 4; Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 3; Red Hat Build of Keycloak; Red Hat Ceph Storage 9; Red Hat Fuse 7; Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7; Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8; Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces; Red Hat Single Sign-On 7.

CVE-2026-58062
Unclassified
Aug 3, 2026
High7.4Red Hat

High [CVE-2026-59650] Bouncy Castle for Java: Cryptographic key compromise due to unvalidated Diffie-Hellman peer value

In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, MTI/A0 DH agreement exponentiates unvalidated peer value. The software fails to validate Diffie-Hellman peer values during key agreement. A remote attacker can exploit this flaw to compromise cryptographic keys, potentially leading to the decryption of sensitive communications or successful impersonation. Red Hat severity: Important — CVSS 7.4 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). Weakness: CWE-325. Affected Red Hat products: Red Hat AMQ Broker 7; Red Hat build of Apache Camel for Spring Boot 4; Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 3; Red Hat Build of Keycloak; Red Hat Fuse 7; Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7; Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8; Red Hat Single Sign-On 7. Under investigation: OpenShift Developer Tools and Services; Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2; Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces; Red Hat Satellite 6. Red Hat lists Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3; Red Hat build of Quarkus; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9; Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack as not affected. Will not fix / out of support: Red Hat Fuse 7; Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7; Red Hat Single Sign-On 7. Red Hat does not currently list a fixing RHSA for this CVE.

CVE-2026-59650
Unclassified
Aug 3, 2026
High7.4Red Hat

High [CVE-2026-8763] Bouncy Castle for Java: Name Constraints bypass via trailing dot in rfc822Name and URI

In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, Name Constraints bypass via trailing dot in rfc822Name and URI. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12, and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bc-fips 1.0.2.7 (1.0.X series), 2.0.2 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.3 (2.1.X series). A flaw was found in Bouncy Castle for Java, a cryptographic library. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by manipulating rfc822Name and URI fields within X.509 certificates using a trailing dot. This bypasses Name Constraints, potentially leading to spoofing or unauthorized access. Such an exploit impacts the integrity and confidentiality of communications. Red Hat severity: Important — CVSS 7.4 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). Weakness: CWE-295. Affected Red Hat products: Red Hat build of Apache Camel for Spring Boot 4; Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 3; Red Hat Build of Keycloak; Red Hat Ceph Storage 9; Red Hat Fuse 7; Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7; Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8; Red Hat Single Sign-On 7. Under investigation: OpenShift Developer Tools and Services; Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2; Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces; Red Hat Satellite 6.

CVE-2026-8763
Unclassified
Aug 3, 2026
Medium5.3Red Hat

Medium [CVE-2026-69198] Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) and trust-boundary bypass

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) and trust-boundary bypass. Red Hat rates this moderate (CVSS 5.3). Weakness: CWE-1389. Red Hat lists fixing advisory RHSA-2026:50826 with package grafana13-1-main-13.1.1-0.5.2.hum1, grafana12-4-main-12.4.6-0.3.hum1.

CVE-2026-69198
Unclassified
Aug 4, 2026
Medium5.3Red Hat

Medium [CVE-2026-69153] Information disclosure via crafted sourceMappingURL

PostCSS takes a CSS file and provides an API to analyze and modify its rules by transforming the rules into an Abstract Syntax Tree. Prior to 8.5.19, if from is unset, an attacker can cause PreviousMap.loadFile() to read an unintended source-map file by supplying an absolute or directory-traversal sourceMappingURL. The resulting map’s sources and sourcesContent may then be exposed to the application. This issue is fixed in version 8.5.19. A flaw was found in PostCSS. A remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability by providing a specially crafted sourceMappingURL when a specific configuration (the 'from' parameter) is not set. This can cause the application to read and expose unintended source-map files, potentially revealing sensitive information about the application's source code. Red Hat rates this flaw as Moderate because the information disclosed is limited to files with a.map extension. Source map files may contain source code paths and content, but the attacker cannot read arbitrary files on the system. Exploitation requires the application to process attacker-controlled CSS through PostCSS on the server side. Red Hat severity: Moderate — CVSS 5.3 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N). Weakness: CWE-22.

CVE-2026-69153
Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Aug 4, 2026
Medium4.4Red Hat

Medium [CVE-2026-18477] TOCTOU in incremental dumpdir 'X' rename handling allows restore path escape

A TOCTOU (Time-of-Check Time-of-Use) vulnerability in GNU tar's incremental dumpdir 'X' rename handling allows a local attacker with write access to a directory being backed up to influence the restore process if the attacker has access to the system where the restore is being performed. During restoration, files or directories may be created, renamed or overwritten outside the intended extraction directory. This could lead to unauthorized file modification or, in some cases, privilege escalation. Exploitation does not require the attacker to modify or craft the archive, and standard backup and restore workflows—including extracting into a newly created directory without using the -P option do not mitigate the issue. This issue affects GNU tar incremental backup and restore (-g/-G). A local attacker who can write to content included in an incremental backup, and who can also access the system where that backup is later restored, may cause the restore to create, rename, or overwrite paths outside the intended extraction directory via a TOCTOU race in dumpdir 'X' handling. Red Hat is assessing impact for the tar package in supported products. Red Hat severity: Moderate — CVSS 4.4 (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N). Weakness: CWE-367.

CVE-2026-18477
Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Aug 4, 2026
Medium5.4Red Hat

Medium [CVE-2026-18651] SASL PLAIN bind installs connection credentials before account-lock check, allowing continued access as a locked account

A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. During SASL PLAIN authentication, the server installs connection-level bind credentials before performing the account-lock check. If the account is subsequently found to be locked, the bind is reported as failed to the client, but the already-installed authenticated state on the connection is not reverted. A client that supplies valid credentials for an account that has been administratively locked can continue to use the same connection with that account's privileges, defeating account lock as an access-revocation control. This flaw lets a user authenticate to an already-locked account (nsAccountLock: true) via SASL PLAIN, using that account's own correct password. The server checks the password before it checks the lock, so the connection becomes authenticated even though the client is told the bind failed. After bind, the user can read and modify what that account was already permitted to touch - no escalation and access beyond it's own rights. Red Hat severity: Moderate — CVSS 5.4 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N). Weakness: CWE-287. Affected Red Hat products: Red Hat Directory Server 11; Red Hat Directory Server 12; Red Hat Directory Server 13; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9. Red Hat lists Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 as not affected.

CVE-2026-18651
Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Aug 4, 2026
Medium4.4Red Hat

Medium [CVE-2026-18508] --one-top-level hardlink targets not confined to top-level directory enabling arbitrary file overwrite

A flaw was found in GNU tar. When extracting an archive with the --one-top-level option, hardlink targets are not confined to the designated top-level directory and may resolve relative to the extraction working directory. A crafted archive can create hardlinks that escape the intended boundary and, when combined with a preexisting symbolic link under the working directory, may allow writing outside that boundary during a single extraction. Red Hat Enterprise Linux is affected. This issue only applies when the --one-top-level option is used to extract an untrusted archive. Default tar extraction without --one-top-level is not impacted by this specific boundary failure. Users should avoid using --one-top-level as the sole confinement mechanism for untrusted archives until fixed packages are available. Red Hat severity: Moderate — CVSS 4.4 (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N). Weakness: CWE-59. Red Hat lists Red Hat Hardened Images as not affected. Red Hat fixing advisory: RHSA-2026:61586, RHSA-2026:70390, RHSA-2026:61581, RHSA-2026:61783, RHSA-2026:50807, RHSA-2026:66018. Affected products named by the advisory: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9; Red Hat Discovery 2; and 5 more.

CVE-2026-18508
Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Aug 4, 2026
Medium5.5Red Hat

Medium [CVE-2026-68742] NSS responder out-of-bounds read via unchecked addrlen in GETHOSTBYADDR

A flaw was found in SSSD. The sss_nss_protocol_parse_addr() function in the NSS responder does not validate the addrlen field against the remaining packet body size. A local attacker can exploit this via a crafted GETHOSTBYADDR request to the NSS responder socket, causing an out-of-bounds read and process crash, resulting in a denial of service. This issue can only be triggered by a local attacker who can connect to the SSSD NSS responder unix socket and send crafted requests. The over-read bytes are used as a lookup key and are not returned to the client, so the impact is limited to denial of service. The sssd monitor may respawn the responder, but repeated crashes can lead to a persistent name-resolution outage for SSSD-managed users. Red Hat severity: Moderate — CVSS 5.5 (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H). Weakness: CWE-125. Affected Red Hat products: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9; Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4. Red Hat lists Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 as not affected. Red Hat does not currently list a fixing RHSA for this CVE. Affected products named by the advisory: Red Hat package: sssd.

CVE-2026-68742
Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Aug 3, 2026
Medium5.5Red Hat

Medium [CVE-2026-68743] PAM responder out-of-bounds read via unchecked auth_token_length in protocol v1

A flaw was found in SSSD. The extract_authtok_v1() function in the PAM responder does not validate the auth_token_length field against the remaining buffer size before processing. A local attacker can exploit this via a crafted protocol v1 request to the PAM responder socket, causing an out-of-bounds read and process crash, resulting in a denial of service. This issue can only be triggered by a local attacker who can connect to the SSSD PAM responder unix socket and send crafted protocol v1 requests. The stock PAM client uses protocol v3 and is not affected by this path. On SSSD 2.10 and later, responders run as an unprivileged user; on earlier versions they may run as root. In either case, the impact is a denial of service of SSSD-mediated authentication. The sssd monitor may respawn the responder, but repeated crashes can lead to a persistent authentication outage for SSSD-managed users. This issue is distinct from CVE-2026-6245, which affects a different code path (pam_passkey_child_read_data). Red Hat severity: Moderate — CVSS 5.5 (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H). Weakness: CWE-125. Affected Red Hat products: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9; Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4. Will not fix / out of support: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.

CVE-2026-68743
Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Aug 3, 2026
Medium5.3Red Hat

Medium [CVE-2026-12259] Installation of attacker-controlled packages due to improper checksum validation

Installation of attacker-controlled packages due to improper checksum validation. Red Hat rates this moderate (CVSS 5.3). Weakness: CWE-354. Affected products named by the advisory: Exploit Intelligence; Lightspeed Core; OpenShift Lightspeed; Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2; and 1 more. Affected products named by the advisory: Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI).

CVE-2026-12259
Unclassified
Aug 3, 2026
Medium5.5Red Hat

Medium [CVE-2026-6695] remote code execution via crafted paa file

A flaw was found in GIMP. A remote attacker could exploit this by tricking a user into opening a specially crafted PAA (Paint Shop Pro Array) image file. This vulnerability, a heap-based out-of-bounds write in the decode_lzss() function of the PAA file format plugin, allows data to be written beyond the intended memory buffer. This could lead to heap metadata corruption and potentially enable the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the affected system. Red Hat Enterprise Linux systems where GIMP is installed and used to process untrusted image files are affected. Red Hat severity: Moderate — CVSS 5.5 (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H). Weakness: CWE-805. Red Hat does not currently list a fixing RHSA for this CVE. Affected products named by the advisory: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9; and 1 more. Affected products named by the advisory: Red Hat package: gimp.

CVE-2026-6695
Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Aug 3, 2026
Medium5.5Red Hat

Medium [CVE-2026-6694] gimp file-png plugin: denial of service via oversized apng trns chunk

A flaw was found in GIMP's file-png plugin. A remote attacker can exploit this by crafting a malicious Animated Portable Network Graphics (APNG) image containing an oversized tRNS chunk. When processing a specially crafted APNG image, the plugin may crash due to a stack buffer overflow. As GIMP executes plugins in separate processes, the main application remains unaffected, limiting the impact to the plugin's functionality. Red Hat severity: Moderate — CVSS 5.5 (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H). Weakness: CWE-120. Affected Red Hat products: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9. Red Hat does not currently list a fixing RHSA for this CVE. Affected products named by the advisory: Red Hat package: gimp.

CVE-2026-6694
Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Aug 3, 2026
Medium6.5Red Hat

Medium [CVE-2026-59652] LDAP filter injection in legacy jdk1.4 LDAPStoreHelper

In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, LDAP filter injection in legacy jdk1.4 LDAPStoreHelper. This vulnerability allows for LDAP filter injection, where an attacker could provide specially crafted input. This could lead to unauthorized information disclosure or modification of data from the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) directory. Red Hat products only ship jdk15 / jdk18 based artifacts. Red hat products are not affected by this vulnerability. Red Hat severity: Moderate — CVSS 6.5 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N). Weakness: CWE-90.

CVE-2026-59652
Unclassified
Aug 3, 2026

← All vendors