Skip to content
VulniPulse
Medium6.5Zyxel

Medium [CVE-2026-4795] missing authorization vulnerability in Zyxel GS1200-5v3 firmware versions through 1.00(ACPS.2)C0, GS1200-8v3 firmware versions through 1.00(ACPT.2)C0, GS1200-5HPv3 firmware versions through 1.00(ACPU.2)C0, GS1200-8HPv3 firmware versions through 1.00(ACPV.2)C0, and GS1200-10v3 firmware versions through 1.00(ACPW.2)C0 could allow a LAN-based, unauthenticated attacker to read the system configuration from a log file via a crafted HTTP request

This medium-severity Zyxel advisory covers CVE-2026-4795 affecting GS1200, Zyxel.

CVE-2026-4795 Published May 26, 2026Updated by vendor Jul 24, 2026
Affected products & platforms
ZyxelSwitches (GS-series)
Open vendor advisory

Android app · Google Play

Monitor future Zyxel CVEs from your phone.

Choose a whole vendor or a precise platform, then receive matching security advisories by phone notification, email, or both. Coverage follows 32 official vendor sources and 160+ reviewed platform categories.

Matching phone alertsOptional email delivery

Summary

A missing authorization vulnerability in Zyxel GS1200-5v3 firmware versions through 1.00(ACPS.2)C0, GS1200-8v3 firmware versions through 1.00(ACPT.2)C0, GS1200-5HPv3 firmware versions through 1.00(ACPU.2)C0, GS1200-8HPv3 firmware versions through 1.00(ACPV.2)C0, and GS1200-10v3 firmware versions through 1.00(ACPW.2)C0 could allow a LAN-based, unauthenticated attacker to read the system configuration from a log file via a crafted HTTP request.

Affected versions
  • through 1.00

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 2 months ago·verify at source

Fixed versions

No fixed release is recorded yet. That does not prove no patch exists — confirm against the vendor advisory.

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 2 months ago·verify at source

Mitigation

The source record does not include mitigation steps. That is not a statement that no fix exists — read the vendor advisory below for the authoritative guidance.

Official advisory · high-confidence parse· fetched 2 months ago·verify at source

Discussion(0)

No comments yet. Share field notes, upgrade gotchas, or questions — verify against the vendor advisory before acting on community advice.

Sign in to join the discussion.